Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 2502 (2026)

Definitions

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 26 V.S.A. § 2502)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2004 · leading case: State v. Brooks, 2004 VT 88, 861 A.2d 1096.
State v. Brooks, 2004 VT 88, 861 A.2d 1096. · cites it 4× “The court held that, based on the Board’s findings, respondent had engaged in land surveying as defined in 26 V.S.A. § 2502(3) and, therefore, he was required to abide by the requirements of Rule 5.”
Off. of Prof'l Reg. v. Brooks, No. 397 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 29, 2003). · cites it 10× “Rather, he argued that it is not a “survey” under 26 V.S.A. § 2502(3) (defining “land surveying”) but another type of document, the purpose of which was limited to making a technical correction as an inexpensive remedy for a twelve year old permitting error.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 2502(3): 2 cases
State v. Brooks, 2004 VT 88, 861 A.2d 1096. “The court held that, based on the Board’s findings, respondent had engaged in land surveying as defined in 26 V.S.A. § 2502(3) and, therefore, he was required to abide by the requirements of Rule 5.”
Off. of Prof'l Reg. v. Brooks, No. 397 (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 29, 2003). “Rather, he argued that it is not a “survey” under 26 V.S.A. § 2502(3) (defining “land surveying”) but another type of document, the purpose of which was limited to making a technical correction as an inexpensive remedy for a twelve year old permitting error.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.