Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 102 (2026)

Designating homestead in case of levy

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 27 V.S.A. § 102)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1961–2013 · leading case: In re Mead, 489 B.R. 363 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2013).
In re Mead, 489 B.R. 363 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2013). · cites it 3× “The Creditor cites to 27 V.S.A. § 102 to support its proposition that the *370 Debtor may not claim both the Camp and the Housesite as his homestead.”
Abbadessa v. Tegu, 173 A.2d 153 (Vt. 1961). “27 V.S.A. §102. The record does not disclose the impracticability of setting out a homestead from the remaining real estate in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.