Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 341 (2026)

Requirements generally; recording

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : EXECUTION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

(Cite as: 27 V.S.A. § 341)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1960–2026 · leading case: Mortg. Lenders Network, USA v. Sensenich, 873 A.2d 892 (Vt. 2004).
Mortg. Lenders Network, USA v. Sensenich, 873 A.2d 892 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 4× “Although the mortgage deed was acknowledged, the Potters' signatures were not witnessed as required by 27 V.S.A. § 341(a) before the statute was amended in 2004.”
Welch v. Seery, 411 A.2d 1351 (Vt. 1980). “§ 461 (recording of mortgage discharge); 27 V.S.A. § 341 (recording of deeds); 24 V.”
Lakeview Farm, Inc. v. Enman, 689 A.2d 1089 (Vt. 1997). “See 27 V.S.A. § 341(a) (amended in 1994 to require one witness).”
Bendekgey v. Bendekgey, 576 A.2d 433 (Vt. 1990). “, 27 V.S.A. § 341. The argument was not presented below and is waived on appeal.”
Gorman v. Dartmouth Sav. Bank (In Re Gorman), 82 B.R. 253 (D. Vt. 1987). · cites it 2× “Vt.Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 341 sets out the execution and acknowledgment requirements for a valid deed in Vermont.”
West v. Vill. of Morrisville, 563 F. Supp. 1101 (D. Vt. 1983). “This filing requirement also comports with the policy behind Vermont’s recording statute, Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 27 §§ 341, 342 (1975), which operates to require parties claiming an interest in land to record their interest in the town records so that subsequent purchasers will have…”
In Re Gorman, 68 B.R. 541 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1986). “What is more, in 1983 and 1984 the partnership gave mortgages to the Dartmouth Savings Bank and to the Randolph National Bank.”
Obuchowski v. Assocs. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n (In re Briggs), 186 B.R. 830 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1995). · cites it 2× “, were not in conformance with 27 V.S.A. § 341 and 342 in that they were not properly witnessed, acknowledged or recorded.”
Bosley v. BAC Home Loan Servicing L.P. (In Re Bosley), 446 B.R. 79 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2011). · cites it 2× “27 V.S.A. § 341(a). In addition, Vermont law provides that: a mortgage or other conveyance of land .”
SSL Corp. v. Vermont Fed. Bank, FSB (In re SSL Corp.), 167 B.R. 784 (D. Vt. 1993). “On or about the same date, debtor executed a mortgage deed in favor of FSB containing only one witness attestation in violation of the two witness requirement under 27 V.S.A. § 341(a). On April 4, 1990 FSB filed a separate affidavit with the South Burlington Land Records of a…”
Jacobs v. Jewett, 162 A.2d 925 (Vt. 1960). “27 V.S.A. §§341, 342. The plaintiffs brought an action at law in ejectment against the defendants who were in possession of the'farm in question.”
Mortg. Lenders Network, USA v. Sensenich, 313 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2002). · cites it 2× “The mortgage was recorded in the land records, but was not witnessed as required by Vermont law, Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 341 . On January 24, 2000, MLN initiated a foreclosure action against the Potters and filed a foreclosure complaint in the Rut-land Clerk’s office.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 27, § 341(a) — 7 cases
Mortg. Lenders Network, USA v. Sensenich, 873 A.2d 892 (Vt. 2004). “Although the mortgage deed was acknowledged, the Potters' signatures were not witnessed as required by 27 V.S.A. § 341(a) before the statute was amended in 2004.”
Lakeview Farm, Inc. v. Enman, 689 A.2d 1089 (Vt. 1997). “See 27 V.S.A. § 341(a) (amended in 1994 to require one witness).”
Bosley v. BAC Home Loan Servicing L.P. (In Re Bosley), 446 B.R. 79 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2011). “27 V.S.A. § 341(a). In addition, Vermont law provides that: a mortgage or other conveyance of land .”
SSL Corp. v. Vermont Fed. Bank, FSB (In re SSL Corp.), 167 B.R. 784 (D. Vt. 1993). “On or about the same date, debtor executed a mortgage deed in favor of FSB containing only one witness attestation in violation of the two witness requirement under 27 V.S.A. § 341(a). On April 4, 1990 FSB filed a separate affidavit with the South Burlington Land Records of a…”
Ciccotelli v. Deutsche Bank AG, 701 F. App'x 67 (2d Cir. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.