Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 1503 (2026)

Prisoner’s request for final disposition—Article III

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS

(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 1503)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1978–2020 · leading case: State v. Robert E. Stephens, 2020 VT 87, 250 A.3d 601.
State v. Robert E. Stephens, 2020 VT 87, 250 A.3d 601. “As an initial matter, we reject defendant’s argument that his conviction should be vacated for failure to comply with Article III of the IAD, which is set forth in 28 V.S.A. § 1503. Pursuant to § 1503(a), a person in a “party state”1 who has “entered a term of imprisonment” that…”
State v. Winnie, 816 A.2d 545 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 4× “Defendant argues that the State violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD), 28 V.S.A § 1503, by not granting defendant a hearing within -180 days of his request for a final disposition of the three charges.”
In re Roessel, 388 A.2d 835 (Vt. 1978). “28 V.S.A. § 1503 (article III). Appellant was not under a “term of imprisonment,” until May 13, 1976, when he pled guilty to a simple assault charge and a judgment of guilty was entered in the District Court of Vermont at Barre; and at that time he became fully aware of the…”
State v. Crawford, 737 A.2d 366 (Vt. 1999). “The State also argues that while the doctrine of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion is part of the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy, there is no indication that the doctrine is embodied in the statutory remedy in 28 V.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 1503(a): 1 case
State v. Winnie, 816 A.2d 545 (Vt. 2002). “Defendant argues that the State violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD), 28 V.S.A § 1503, by not granting defendant a hearing within -180 days of his request for a final disposition of the three charges.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 1503(b): 1 case
State v. Winnie, 816 A.2d 545 (Vt. 2002). “Defendant argues that the State violated the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD), 28 V.S.A § 1503, by not granting defendant a hearing within -180 days of his request for a final disposition of the three charges.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 1503(d): 1 case
State v. Crawford, 737 A.2d 366 (Vt. 1999). “The State also argues that while the doctrine of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion is part of the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy, there is no indication that the doctrine is embodied in the statutory remedy in 28 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.