Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 255 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : CONDITIONS OF PROBATION; MODIFICATIONS; DISCHARGE

(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 255)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1988–2002 · leading case: State v. Papazoni, 622 A.2d 501 (Vt. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Papazoni, 622 A.2d 501 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 4× “Defendant's argument is based on 28 V.S.A. § 255, which provides: Upon the termination of the period of probation or the earlier discharge of the probationer in accordance with section 251 of this title, the probationer shall be relieved of any obligations imposed by the order…”
State v. Murray, 617 A.2d 135 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 3× “§ 255 provides that when probation terminates or a probationer is discharged early pursuant to § 251, the-“probationer shall be relieved of any obligations imposed by the order of the court and shall have satisfied his sentence for the crime.”
United States v. Jon Tomasi, AKA John Tomasi, Jimmy Tomasi, AKA James Tomasi, & Frank Barrett, AKA Skip Barrett, 313 F.3d 653 (2d Cir. 2002). “3 See Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 255 (“Upon the termination of the period of probation or the earlier discharge of the probationer in accordance with section 251 of this title, the probationer .”
State v. White, 549 A.2d 1069 (Vt. 1988). “§ 255, entitled “Discharge,” which provides: “Upon the termination of the period of probation or the earlier discharge of the probationer in accordance with section 251 of this title, the probationer shall be relieved of any obligations imposed by the order of the court and…”
State v. Pratt, 795 A.2d 1148 (Vt. 2002). “I ascribe to the Legislature an understanding that the public interest is best served by as reasoned and honest a sentencing judgment as is within the capacity of the trial judge to make, responsive to the surrounding circumstances and the person standing before the bench.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.