Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 402 (2026)

Definitions

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 402)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2024 · leading case: Andrew Wood v. Jeffrey Wallin, 2024 VT 21, 316 A.3d 266.
Andrew Wood v. Jeffrey Wallin, 2024 VT 21, 316 A.3d 266. “See 28 V.S.A. § 402(1) (defining parole). ¶ 12.”
State v. Benjamin, 2007 VT 52, 929 A.2d 1276. “" 28 V.S.A. § 402(1). Probation is "a procedure under which a respondent, found guilty of a crime upon verdict or plea, is released by the court, without confinement, subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to the supervision of the commissioner.”
State v. Bensh, 719 A.2d 1155 (Vt. 1998). “” 28 VS.A. § 402; see Miner, 137 Vt. at 334 , 403 A.”
State v. Benjamin, 2007 VT 52, 929 A.2d 1276. “” 28 V.S.A. § 402(1). Probation is “a procedure under which a respondent, found guilty of a crime upon verdict or plea, is released by the court, without confinement, subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to the supervision of the commissioner.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 402(1): 3 cases
Andrew Wood v. Jeffrey Wallin, 2024 VT 21, 316 A.3d 266. “See 28 V.S.A. § 402(1) (defining parole). ¶ 12.”
State v. Benjamin, 2007 VT 52, 929 A.2d 1276. “" 28 V.S.A. § 402(1). Probation is "a procedure under which a respondent, found guilty of a crime upon verdict or plea, is released by the court, without confinement, subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to the supervision of the commissioner.”
State v. Benjamin, 2007 VT 52, 929 A.2d 1276. “” 28 V.S.A. § 402(1). Probation is “a procedure under which a respondent, found guilty of a crime upon verdict or plea, is released by the court, without confinement, subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to the supervision of the commissioner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.