Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 802 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : CARE OF INMATES

(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 802)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1975–2019 · leading case: State v. Scott Provost, 2014 VT 86A (Vt. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Scott Provost, 2014 VT 86A (Vt. 2015). “28 V.S.A. § 802(a)(4). If a violation is established, the court may continue probation, alter the conditions of probation, or revoke probation and impose the underlying sentence.”
Rebideau v. Stoneman, 398 F. Supp. 805 (D. Vt. 1975). · cites it 2× “Both the state and federal systems provide for the inspection of general correspondence, 28 V.S.A. § 802(a); BPPS 7300.1A 6(b) (8-13-74), and afford protection and privilege to communications with courts and attorneys.”
Brandt v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 4× “05 to bar Jeffrey-Michael Brandt, an inmate in the custody of the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, from corresponding with a Colorado inmate, Ms. Lee Dougherty, merely because both were prisoners.”
Jeffrey-Michael Brandt, 2019 VT 32 (Vt. 2019). · cites it 4× “The parties had previously entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Dismissal (the Stipulation) in which DOC agreed not to prohibit plaintiff’s correspondence with other inmates not in the custody of DOC on the basis that this would violate 28 V.S.A. § 802 and VTDOC Directive…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 802(a) — 1 case
Rebideau v. Stoneman, 398 F. Supp. 805 (D. Vt. 1975). “Both the state and federal systems provide for the inspection of general correspondence, 28 V.S.A. § 802(a); BPPS 7300.1A 6(b) (8-13-74), and afford protection and privilege to communications with courts and attorneys.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 802(a)(4) — 1 case
State v. Scott Provost, 2014 VT 86A (Vt. 2015). “28 V.S.A. § 802(a)(4). If a violation is established, the court may continue probation, alter the conditions of probation, or revoke probation and impose the underlying sentence.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 802(b) — 1 case
Rebideau v. Stoneman, 398 F. Supp. 805 (D. Vt. 1975). “Both the state and federal systems provide for the inspection of general correspondence, 28 V.S.A. § 802(a); BPPS 7300.1A 6(b) (8-13-74), and afford protection and privilege to communications with courts and attorneys.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 802(c) — 1 case
Jeffrey-Michael Brandt, 2019 VT 32 (Vt. 2019). “The parties had previously entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Dismissal (the Stipulation) in which DOC agreed not to prohibit plaintiff’s correspondence with other inmates not in the custody of DOC on the basis that this would violate 28 V.S.A. § 802 and VTDOC Directive…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.