Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 2513 (2026)

Lines along railroad tracks; wireless and other telecommunications facilities

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 2513)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1975–2006 · leading case: Preseault v. City of Burlington, 412 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2005).
Preseault v. City of Burlington, 412 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2005). · cites it 6× “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30 §§ 2513, 2514, and 2515.”
Delaware & Hudson Ry. Co. v. Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 360 A.2d 86 (Vt. 1976). · cites it 3× “The enactment involved is 30 V.S.A. § 2513: A domestic telegraph, telephone or electric light company may erect and maintain its line along the sides of railroad tracks within the limits of lands owned or held by a railroad corporation on paying to it reasonable compensation…”
Preseault v. City of Burlington, 464 F.3d 215 (2d Cir. 2006). “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30 § 2513(a). It further provides that, upon transfer of a railroad easement, a line authorized by section 2513 remains the property of the installing utility.”
Delaware & Hudson Ry. Co. v. Cent. Vermont Pub. Serv. Corp., 365 A.2d 275 (Vt. 1975). “It appearing that the action brought before the Rutland Superior Court is governed by the provisions of 30 V.S.A. § 2513 the judgment is vacated and the cause dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 2513(a): 2 cases
Preseault v. City of Burlington, 412 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2005). “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30 §§ 2513, 2514, and 2515.”
Preseault v. City of Burlington, 464 F.3d 215 (2d Cir. 2006). “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30 § 2513(a). It further provides that, upon transfer of a railroad easement, a line authorized by section 2513 remains the property of the installing utility.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 2513(b): 1 case
Preseault v. City of Burlington, 412 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2005). “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30 §§ 2513, 2514, and 2515.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.