Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 932 (2026)

Claims against the State

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : CLAIMS

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 932)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: Maynus v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Maynus v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 3× “In addition, specific to Count 4, 32 V.S.A. § 932(a) explicitly requires filing in the small claims division.”
Abel v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2× “Summary of Key Facts Found and Rulings Made by the SCC Claims for lost or stolen property are governed by 32 V.S.A. § 932 and DOC Directive 321.02, available at https://outside.”
Maynus v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2× “Some months will be slightly greater than $2000 but I waive it down to $2000 per claim for the purposes of 32 V.S.A. § 932 Counts 1) Jul 2) Aug 3) Sep 4) Nov 5) Dec (2020) 6) Jan 7) Feb 8) Mar 9) Jun 10) Jul 11) Aug 12) Sep 13) Oct 14) Nov 15) Dec (2021) 16) Jan 17) Feb 18) Mar…”
butler v. doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “2 1To the extent Plaintiff seeks to bring this action under the provisions of 32 V.S.A. § 932, the result would be the same.”
Butler v. VT DOC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020). “2 1To the extent Plaintiff seeks to bring this action under the provisions of 32 V.S.A. § 932, the result would be the same.”
Morgan v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “The SCC determined that DOC’s grievance policy is such a remedy, that it was available to provide a potential remedy for Appellant’s claim, and that he failed to pursue that remedy.”
Anthony Deyo v. Andrew Pallito, Comm'r of the Dept. of Corr. (Vt. 2013). “The small claims court dismissed the action as time barred under the eighteen-month statute of limitations set forth in 32 V.S.A. § 932(b). In so ruling, the court rejected plaintiff’s argument that the limitations statute was tolled by 12 V.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 932(a): 1 case
Maynus v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “In addition, specific to Count 4, 32 V.S.A. § 932(a) explicitly requires filing in the small claims division.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 932(b): 3 cases
Abel v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Summary of Key Facts Found and Rulings Made by the SCC Claims for lost or stolen property are governed by 32 V.S.A. § 932 and DOC Directive 321.02, available at https://outside.”
Maynus v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “In addition, specific to Count 4, 32 V.S.A. § 932(a) explicitly requires filing in the small claims division.”
Anthony Deyo v. Andrew Pallito, Comm'r of the Dept. of Corr. (Vt. 2013). “The small claims court dismissed the action as time barred under the eighteen-month statute of limitations set forth in 32 V.S.A. § 932(b). In so ruling, the court rejected plaintiff’s argument that the limitations statute was tolled by 12 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.