Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 7111 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : LICENSING OF LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES

(Cite as: 33 V.S.A. § 7111)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Darryl R. Montague v. Hundred Acre Homestead, LLC, 208 A.3d 609 (Vt. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Darryl R. Montague v. Hundred Acre Homestead, LLC, 208 A.3d 609 (Vt. 2019). · cites it 7× “Considering these factors, we conclude that Montague is not entitled to sue Hundred Acre for damages on account of its alleged violations because it is clear from the plain language of 33 V.S.A. § 7111 and the Licensing and Operations Regulations that their overarching purpose…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 7111(a) — 1 case
Darryl R. Montague v. Hundred Acre Homestead, LLC, 208 A.3d 609 (Vt. 2019). “Considering these factors, we conclude that Montague is not entitled to sue Hundred Acre for damages on account of its alleged violations because it is clear from the plain language of 33 V.S.A. § 7111 and the Licensing and Operations Regulations that their overarching purpose…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 7111(d) — 1 case
Darryl R. Montague v. Hundred Acre Homestead, LLC, 208 A.3d 609 (Vt. 2019). “Considering these factors, we conclude that Montague is not entitled to sue Hundred Acre for damages on account of its alleged violations because it is clear from the plain language of 33 V.S.A. § 7111 and the Licensing and Operations Regulations that their overarching purpose…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 7111(d)(3) — 1 case
Darryl R. Montague v. Hundred Acre Homestead, LLC, 208 A.3d 609 (Vt. 2019). “Considering these factors, we conclude that Montague is not entitled to sue Hundred Acre for damages on account of its alleged violations because it is clear from the plain language of 33 V.S.A. § 7111 and the Licensing and Operations Regulations that their overarching purpose…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.