Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 1-217 (2026)
Headlines of sections
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The headlines of the sections printed in black-face type are intended as mere catchwords to indicate the contents of the sections and do not constitute part of the act of the General Assembly.
Code 1919, § 5; Code 1950, § 1-13; 1950, p. 21, § 1-13.9; 2005, c. 839.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: Butler v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. Bd., 780 S.E.2d 277 (Va. 2015).
Butler v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. Bd., 780 S.E.2d 277 (Va. 2015). “Code § 1-217 ; see also Thurston Metals & Supply Co.”
Foster v. Commonwealth, 623 S.E.2d 902 (Va. 2006). “Addressing defendant's reliance substantively upon the headline of Code § 18.2-96, and her argument in support, we are of opinion that the statute has no impact upon the foregoing analysis.”
Atl. Coast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. Avery, 92 Va. Cir. 387 (Nelson Cir. Ct. 2016). “Va. Code § 1-217 (“The headlines of the sections printed in black-face type are intended as mere catchwords to indicate the contents of the sections and do not constitute a part of the act of the General Assembly.”
Harry M. Williams, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2018). “See generally Code § 1-217 (explaining that the heading of a code section is not part of the law); Foster v.”
Commonwealth v. Hall, 823 S.E.2d 485 (Va. 2019). “2d 277 (2015) (citing Code § 1-217 ). See, e.g. , United States v.”
Richard Elton Whitted v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2025). “32, 38 (2015) (quoting Code § 1-217). The phrase “violent sexual felony” does not appear in the statute itself.”
Hudson v. Virginia Emp. Comm'n, 69 Va. Cir. 318 (Richmond County Cir. Ct. 2005). “” While headlines of code sections “are intended as mere catchwords to indicate the contents of the sections and do not constitute part of the act of the General Assembly,” see Va. Code § 1-217, and while the word “preference” is not contained anywhere in the body of the…”
Atl. Coast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. Wadsworth, 92 Va. Cir. 188 (Augusta Cir. Ct. 2015). “Code § 1-217 (“The headlines of the sections printed in black-face type are intended as mere catchwords to indicate the contents of the sections and do not constitute a part of the act of the General Assembly.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.