A. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 16.1-69.55, the clerk of the juvenile and domestic relations district court shall, on January 2 of each year or on a date designated by the court, destroy its files, papers and records, including electronic records, connected with any proceeding concerning a juvenile in such court, if such juvenile has attained the age of 19 years and five years have elapsed since the date of the last hearing in any case of the juvenile which is subject to this section. However, if the juvenile was found guilty of an offense for which the clerk is required by § 46.2-383 to furnish an abstract to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the records shall be destroyed when the juvenile has attained the age of 29. If the juvenile was found guilty of a delinquent act which would be a felony if committed by an adult, the records shall be retained.
B. However, in all files in which the court records concerning a juvenile contain a finding of guilty of any offense ancillary to (i) a delinquent act that would be a felony if committed by an adult or (ii) any offense for which the clerk is required by § 46.2-383 to furnish an abstract to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the records of any such ancillary offense shall also be retained for the time specified for the felony or the offense reported to the Department of Motor Vehicles as specified in subsection A, and all such records shall be available for inspection as provided in § 16.1-305.
C. A person who has been the subject of a delinquency or traffic proceeding and (i) has been found innocent thereof or (ii) such proceeding was otherwise dismissed, may file a motion requesting the destruction of all records pertaining to such charge. Notice of such motion shall be given to the attorney for the Commonwealth. Unless good cause is shown why such records should not be destroyed, the court shall grant the motion, and shall send copies of the order to all officers or agencies that are repositories of such records, and all such officers and agencies shall comply with the order.
D. Each person shall be notified of his rights under subsections A and C of this section at the time of his dispositional hearing.
E. Upon destruction of the records of a proceeding as provided in subsections A, B, and C, the violation of law shall be treated as if it never occurred. All index references shall be deleted and the court and law-enforcement officers and agencies shall reply and the person may reply to any inquiry that no record exists with respect to such person.
F. All docket sheets shall be destroyed in the sixth year after the last hearing date recorded on the docket sheet.
Code 1950, § 16.1-193; 1956, c. 555; 1977, c. 559; 1979, cc. 736, 737; 1989, c. 183; 1990, c. 258; 1993, cc. 468, 589, 926; 1994, cc. 859, 949; 1996, c. 463; 2008, c. 519; 2014, c. 271.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case:
Com. v. Garrett, 667 S.E.2d 739 (Va. 2008).
Com. v. Garrett, 667 S.E.2d 739 (Va. 2008).
· cites it 48× “We consider whether the circuit court correctly ruled that Code § 16.1-306, as applicable to Garrett, prohibited the Commonwealth's use in the SVPA proceeding of records relating to proceedings involving Garrett in a juvenile and domestic relations district court when he was a…”
Commonwealth v. Diaz, 585 S.E.2d 552 (Va. 2003).
· cites it 4× “In this context, while I agree with the majority that the order of the circuit court did not abrogate the judgment of the district court, it must necessarily follow that the circuit court was thereafter without jurisdiction under Code § 16.”
Lavinder v. Com., 395 S.E.2d 211 (Va. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Code § 16.1-306. In addition, criminal penalties are provided for those who wrongly disclose information concerning juvenile court records or proceedings.”
Coleman v. Clarke, No. 7:19-cv-00386 (W.D. Va. June 15, 2020).
· cites it 5× “1998) 4 Virginia Code § 16.1-306(C) provides that the juvenile and domestic relations district court shall order the destruction of records pertaining to proceedings in which the offender has been found innocent or the “proceeding was otherwise dismissed” on motion and for good…”
Christopher Coleman v. Chadwick Dotson, 160 F.4th 472 (4th Cir. 2025).
· cites it 2× “Coleman also indicated that Phillips should have challenged the Presentence Investigation Report’s erroneous statement that Coleman had shot victim Mary Cook-Moore three times, but Coleman abandoned that aspect of his claim after expressing satisfaction that the parties and the…”
Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-306(B): 1 case
Christopher Coleman v. Chadwick Dotson, 160 F.4th 472 (4th Cir. 2025).
“Coleman also indicated that Phillips should have challenged the Presentence Investigation Report’s erroneous statement that Coleman had shot victim Mary Cook-Moore three times, but Coleman abandoned that aspect of his claim after expressing satisfaction that the parties and the…”
Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-306(C): 1 case
Coleman v. Clarke, No. 7:19-cv-00386 (W.D. Va. June 15, 2020).
“1998) 4 Virginia Code § 16.1-306(C) provides that the juvenile and domestic relations district court shall order the destruction of records pertaining to proceedings in which the offender has been found innocent or the “proceeding was otherwise dismissed” on motion and for good…”
Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-306(E): 1 case
Coleman v. Clarke, No. 7:19-cv-00386 (W.D. Va. June 15, 2020).
“1998) 4 Virginia Code § 16.1-306(C) provides that the juvenile and domestic relations district court shall order the destruction of records pertaining to proceedings in which the offender has been found innocent or the “proceeding was otherwise dismissed” on motion and for good…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.