Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-155 (2026)

Disqualification or temporary disability of attorney for Commonwealth; appointment of substitute; powers, duties and compensation of such appointee

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the attorney for the Commonwealth of any county or city is connected by blood or marriage with the accused, or is so situated with respect to such accused as to render it improper, in his opinion, concurred in by the judge, for him to act, or if such attorney for the Commonwealth of any county or city is unable to act, or to attend to his official duties as attorney for the Commonwealth, due to sickness, disability or other reason of a temporary nature, then upon notification by such attorney for the Commonwealth, or upon the certificate of his attending physician, or the clerk of the court, which fact shall be entered of record, the judge of the circuit court shall appoint from another jurisdiction an attorney for the Commonwealth or an assistant attorney for the Commonwealth, with the consent of such attorney for the Commonwealth or assistant, who is not authorized by law to engage in private practice for such case or cases, term or terms of court, or period or periods of time, as may be necessary or desirable, and the same to be forthwith entered of record. However, if the circuit court determines that the appointment of such attorney for the Commonwealth or such assistant attorney for the Commonwealth is not appropriate or that such an attorney or assistant is unavailable, or for other good cause, then the circuit court may appoint an attorney-at-law who shall be compensated pursuant to § 19.2-332. Such appointee shall act in place of, and otherwise perform the duties and exercise the powers of, such disqualified or disabled attorney for the Commonwealth, in regard to such case or cases, for the term or terms of the court, or the period or periods of time, for which the appointment and designation is made, or until the disqualified or disabled attorney for the Commonwealth shall again be able to attend to his duties as such. Nothing herein shall prevent a court from appointing as a special assistant attorney for the Commonwealth, without additional compensation, an attorney employed by a state agency when such appointment is requested by the attorney for the Commonwealth and the court determines such appointment will aid in the prosecution of a particular case or cases.

An attorney for the Commonwealth or assistant attorney for the Commonwealth who is required by law to devote full time to his duties as such shall not receive additional compensation for services rendered on appointment pursuant to this section. However, such attorney for the Commonwealth or assistant may receive reimbursement for actual expenses incurred, as approved by the Compensation Board to be paid by the Compensation Board, provided such expenses are not otherwise reimbursed by the county or city which he is elected or appointed to serve or by the Compensation Board.

Code 1950, §§ 19.1-9, 19.1-10; 1960, c. 366; 1975, c. 495; 1983, c. 362; 1985, c. 321; 1996, c. 968.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Yarbrough v. Commonwealth, 519 S.E.2d 602 (Va. 1999).
Yarbrough v. Commonwealth, 519 S.E.2d 602 (Va. 1999). · cites it 24× “In that motion, the Commonwealth relied on Code § 19.2-155, which permits the appointment of a special prosecutor where the local Commonwealth's Attorney is unable to fulfill his duties by reason of temporary disability or ethical disqualification.”
Pease v. Commonwealth, 573 S.E.2d 272 (Va. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “The substitute Commonwealth's attorneys did not have the report when they re-indicted, and it was not in the files received from the first prosecutor.”
Riner v. Com., 601 S.E.2d 555 (Va. 2004). · cites it 2× “Nor do we believe that the General Assembly's amendment of Code § 19.2-155 in 1996 reflects any preference on the part of the General Assembly to restrict the private bar from appearing as prosecutors.”
Blue v. Virginia State Bar ex rel. First Dist. Comm., 282 S.E.2d 6 (Va. 1981). · cites it 8× “In this appeal, we consider whether Code § 54-74 prohibits the appointment of a substitute Commonwealth’s Attorney pursuant to Code § 19.2-155 or the designation of a substitute judge in accordance with Code § 17-7 in a disciplinary proceeding brought against an attorney.”
In re Morrissey, 433 S.E.2d 918 (Va. 1993). · cites it 14× “The said circuit court order, applying Code § 19.2-155, found that “the circumstances and limitations currently involving Joseph D.”
In re Hannett, 619 S.E.2d 465 (Va. 2005). · cites it 2× “2-156 (authorizing appointment of acting attorney for the Commonwealth when Commonwealth's Attorney has a prolonged absence from performing the duties of the office, with attendant loss of salary) with Code § 19.2-155 (authorizing appointment of acting attorney for the…”
Adkins v. Commonwealth, 492 S.E.2d 833 (Va. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “See Code § 19.2-155. Adkins objected to the appointment of Epling.”
Commonwealth v. Kilgore, 426 S.E.2d 837 (Va. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Because McAfee’s law firm had been consulted by Kilgore while McAfee was a member, at the request of Large, the Circuit Court of Wise County entered the following order: VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WISE COUNTY IN RE: DEATH OF RICK JONES ORDER Comes now the Commonwealth, by…”
Blue v. Virginia State Bar, 282 S.E.2d 6 (Va. 1981). · cites it 8× “On July 18, 1979, the First District Committee of the Virginia State Bar filed a complaint against Ivy P.”
Commonwealth v. Stewart, 66 Va. Cir. 135 (Portsmouth Cir. Ct. 2004). · cites it 3× “See Va. Code § 19.2-155 (providing for appointment of special attorneys for the Commonwealth).”
Mary Price v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 849 S.E.2d 140 (Va. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 4× “Code § 19.2-155. No such appointment is found in the record.”
Pease v. Huffman, 72 Va. Cir. 610 (Wise Norton Cir. Ct. 2005). · cites it 10× “A), was contrary to the provisions of Virginia Code § 19.2-155. In paragraph 7(A)3, Petitioner further asserts that, due to the alleged failure of the trial court to comply with § 19.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.