Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-271.1 (2026)
Competency of spouses to testify
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Persons married to each other shall be competent witnesses to testify for or against each other in criminal cases, except as otherwise provided.
Code 1950, § 8-287; 1977, c. 624; 2020, c. 900.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1982–2005 · leading case: Washington v. Commonwealth, 616 S.E.2d 774 (Va. Ct. App. 2005).
Washington v. Commonwealth, 616 S.E.2d 774 (Va. Ct. App. 2005). “Of course, this does not mean that the many cases construing Virginia’s other recidivist statutes are entirely inapplicable. The General Assembly may certainly be said to have been aware of the construction and effect given to prior recidivist statutes when it enacted Code § 19.”
Livingston v. Commonwealth, 466 S.E.2d 757 (Va. Ct. App. 1996). ““Code § 19.2-271.1 provides that husbands and wives are competent witnesses to testify for or against each other in criminal cases except as otherwise provided [in Code § 19.”
Brown v. Commonwealth, 292 S.E.2d 319 (Va. 1982). “Code § 19.2-271.1 provides that husbands and wives are competent witnesses to testify for or against each other in criminal cases except as otherwise provided.”
Washington v. Com., 616 S.E.2d 774 (Va. Ct. App. 2005). “The General Assembly may certainly be said to have been aware of the construction and effect given to prior recidivist statutes when it enacted Code § 19.2-271.1. To that end, those cases are relevant—though not dispositive—when delving into the issue of legislative intent.”
Calvin Bowe v. Commonwealth, No. 2285943 (Va. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 1996). “Defendant's subsequent objection to wife's testimony during trial of the instant offense, based upon the spousal privilege, was overruled by the court. "Husband[s] and wi[ves] shall be competent witnesses to testify for or against each other in criminal cases, except as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.