The failure of any person or corporation to comply with the provisions of this chapter shall not prevent a recovery by or against such person or corporation, in any of the courts in this Commonwealth on any cause of action heretofore or hereafter arising, but no action shall be maintained in any of the courts in this Commonwealth by any such person, corporation or his or its assignee or successor in title unless and until the certificate required by this chapter has been filed.
Code 1950, § 59-176; 1968, c. 439.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
11
cases, 1976–2016 · leading case:
Bain v. Phillips, 228 S.E.2d 576 (Va. 1976).
Bain v. Phillips, 228 S.E.2d 576 (Va. 1976).
· cites it 2× “He testified categorically that he never advised Bain to initiate criminal proceedings against Phillips but that he merely suggested to Bain that he make Phillips’ failure to file the certificate an issue in the mechanic’s lien suit under the provisions of Code § 59.1-76, note 2…”
Transurban v. D'Arco, 92 Va. Cir. 285 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2016).
· cites it 6× “Phlegar involved a predecessor statute to Va. Code § 59.1-76, viz., Va. Code Ann. § 4722 (1) (1942).”
Precision Steel Mfg. Co. v. Vinales (In Re Vinales), 268 B.R. 749 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2001).
· cites it 5× “See Va.Code § 59.1-76. Section 59.1-76 does not render a cause of action illegal, it merely suspends the right to maintain it until the party has complied with the law.”
Minor v. Gal-Tenn Corp., 47 Va. Cir. 53 (Scott Cir. Ct. 1998).
· cites it 6× “See Virginia Code § 59.1-76. Yet non-compliance is not an absolute bar to a party that attempts to bring a cause of action.”
Bryant v. Rorer, 66 Va. Cir. 226 (Roanoke County Cir. Ct. 2004).
· cites it 3× “Va. Code § 59.1-76. Faith, Inc., did not file a fictitious name certificate for the trade name Mostly Sofa’s with the Roanoke City Circuit Court Clerk’s Office as is required by § 59.”
C. M. Prods. v. Milne, 3 Va. Cir. 4 (Alexandria Cir. Ct. 1980).
“These cases are consistent with the language of § 59.1-76 of the Virginia Code which provides that ".”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.