Va. Code » Title 59.1. Trade and Commerce » Chapter 1.1. Virginia Antitrust Act
Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 59.1-9.1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter may be known and cited as the "Virginia Antitrust Act."

1974, c. 545.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1979–2011 · leading case: Reasor v. City of Norfolk, Va., 606 F. Supp. 788 (E.D. Va. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Reasor v. City of Norfolk, Va., 606 F. Supp. 788 (E.D. Va. 1984). · cites it 6× “Va.Code § 59.1-9.1, et seq. The Court GRANTS the City’s motion for summary judgment on both Counts 9 and 10.”
Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co., 92 F.R.D. 32 (E.D. Va. 1981). · cites it 3× “Apart from these actions, named plaintiffs have played a minimal role in the furtherance of the suit and have demonstrated only a minimal knowledge of its nature.”
Reid v. Boyle, 527 S.E.2d 137 (Va. 2000). · cites it 2× “Reid and Rising Tide Productions alleged in this proceeding that these defendants violated the Virginia Antitrust Act, Code § 59.1-9.1, et seq. The *361 chancellor transferred the law action to the equity side of the court and consolidated the proceedings.”
Virginia Vermiculite, Ltd. v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., 108 F. Supp. 2d 549 (W.D. Va. 2000). · cites it 3× “of the Sherman Act; Count II alleges monopolization by Grace in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act; Count III alleges attempted monopolization by Grace in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act; Count IV alleges conspiracy to monopolize in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Act…”
Sun Publ'g Co. v. Mecklenburg News, Inc., 594 F. Supp. 1512 (E.D. Va. 1984). · cites it 3× “of the Virginia Antitrust Act, Va. Code § 59.1-9.1 et seq.; and conspired to injure another in his trade or business in violation of Va.”
Wood v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Halifax Cnty., 372 S.E.2d 611 (Va. 1988). · cites it 2× “On March 5, 1984, the County of Halifax filed a bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Halifax County against Wood and others under the Virginia Antitrust Act, Code § 59.1-9.1 through -9.18. In this civil action, Halifax County alleged that the defendants had conspired to rig…”
California v. Infineon Tech. AG, 531 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “See Va.Code Ann. § 59.1-9.1 et seq. In the face of this silence, the court looks to the surrounding language of the Act, along with the relevant legal authority cited by the parties, for some clue as to whether standing for indirect purchasers should be inferred.”
PEMCO Corp. v. Rose, 257 S.E.2d 885 (W. Va. 1979). “Defendant also claimed the restrictive competition violated the Virginia AntiTrust Act, Va. Code §§ 59.1-9.1 through 59.1-9.5 (Cum.”
Anglin v. Blue Shield of Virginia, 510 F. Supp. 75 (W.D. Va. 1981). · cites it 3× “1-834, the Plans, are subject to major portions of the Virginia Insurance Code and the Virginia Antitrust Act, §§ 59.1-9.1 et seq. The SCC establishes the Plan’s service areas, § 38.”
Oksanen v. Page Mem'l Hosp., 945 F.2d 696 (4th Cir. 1991). “Va.Code Ann. § 59.1-9.1, et seq. (1990). In fact, the Virginia Act specifically provides that it is to be interpreted and applied in harmony with federal antitrust law.”
Virginia Vermiculite, Ltd. v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., 965 F. Supp. 802 (W.D. Va. 1997). “§ 2 (conspiracy to monopolize) by Grace and HGSI; Count V alleges a violation of the Virginia Antitrust Act, §§ 59.1-9.1 et seq. (antitrust violations that mirror federal law) by Grace and HGSI; and Count VI alleges a violation of Va.”
Integrity Auto Specialists, Inc. v. Meyer, 83 Va. Cir. 119 (Chesapeake Cir. Ct. 2011). · cites it 2× “Defendant’s Plea in Bar: Application of the Virginia Anti-Trust Act At oral argument and on brief, defendant maintains that the Virginia Anti-TrustAct, Virginia Code § 59.1-9.1 et seq. prohibits plaintiff’s recovery for breach of contract because the statute provides “every…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.