Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 63.2-104.1 (2026)

Confidentiality of records of persons receiving domestic and sexual violence services

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In order to ensure the safety of adult and child victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, or victims of a violation of § 18.2-48, 18.2-355, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, or 18.2-357.1, and their families, programs and individuals providing services to such victims shall protect the confidentiality and privacy of persons receiving services.

B. Except as provided in subsections C and D, programs and individuals providing services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, or victims of a violation of § 18.2-48, 18.2-355, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, or 18.2-357.1, shall not:

1. Disclose any personally identifying information or individual information collected in connection with services requested, utilized, or denied through programs for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, or victims of a violation of § 18.2-48, 18.2-355, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, or 18.2-357.1; or

2. Reveal individual client information without the informed, written, reasonably time-limited consent of the person about whom information is sought; the minor and his parent or legal guardian, in cases in which the client is an unemancipated minor; or the guardian of an incapacitated person as defined in § 64.2-2000, whether for this program or any other Federal, State, tribal, or territorial grant program. However, consent for release may not be given by the abuser or alleged abuser of the minor or incapacitated person, or the abuser or alleged abuser of the other parent of the minor.

C. If release of information described in subsection B is compelled by statutory or court mandate, the program or individual providing services shall:

1. Make reasonable attempts to provide notice to victims affected by the disclosure of information; and

2. Take steps necessary to protect the privacy and safety of the persons affected by the release of the information.

D. Programs and individuals providing services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, or victims of a violation of § 18.2-48, 18.2-355, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, or 18.2-357.1, may share:

1. Nonpersonally identifying data in the aggregate regarding services to their clients and nonpersonally identifying demographic information in order to comply with Federal, State, tribal, or territorial reporting, evaluation, or data collection requirements;

2. Court generated information and law-enforcement generated information contained in secure, governmental registries for protection order enforcement purposes; and

3. Information necessary for law enforcement and prosecution purposes.

For purposes of this section, "programs" shall include public and not-for-profit agencies the primary mission of which is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, or victims of a violation of § 18.2-48, 18.2-355, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, or 18.2-357.1.

E. For the purposes of this section, a person may be a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, or a victim of a violation of § 18.2-48, 18.2-355, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, or 18.2-357.1, regardless of whether any person has been charged with or convicted of any offense.

2006, c. 135; 2016, cc. 666, 670.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2018 · leading case: Eramo v. Rolling Stone LLC, 314 F.R.D. 205 (W.D. Va. 2016).
Eramo v. Rolling Stone LLC, 314 F.R.D. 205 (W.D. Va. 2016). · cites it 7× “The court is unaware of any authority that holds that Virginia Code § 63.2-104.1 creates a patient-counselor privilege, and the court declines to do so in this ease.”
Doe v. Old Dominion Univ., 289 F. Supp. 3d 744 (E.D. Va. 2018). · cites it 13× “2 at 44 (invoking "the victim-advocate privilege (whether by statute or otherwise, including, but not limited to, Va. Code Ann. § 63.2-104.1 )"). Defendant subpoenaed the same documents from Plaintiff's Parents and SurvJustice, who also objected under the victim-advocate…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 63.2-104.1(0) — 1 case
Eramo v. Rolling Stone LLC, 314 F.R.D. 205 (W.D. Va. 2016). “The court is unaware of any authority that holds that Virginia Code § 63.2-104.1 creates a patient-counselor privilege, and the court declines to do so in this ease.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 63.2-104.1(A) — 1 case
Eramo v. Rolling Stone LLC, 314 F.R.D. 205 (W.D. Va. 2016). “The court is unaware of any authority that holds that Virginia Code § 63.2-104.1 creates a patient-counselor privilege, and the court declines to do so in this ease.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 63.2-104.1(B)(l) — 1 case
Eramo v. Rolling Stone LLC, 314 F.R.D. 205 (W.D. Va. 2016). “The court is unaware of any authority that holds that Virginia Code § 63.2-104.1 creates a patient-counselor privilege, and the court declines to do so in this ease.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.