Va. Code » Title 8.01. Civil Remedies and Procedure » Chapter 14. Evidence » Article 6.2. Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act
Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-412.8 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act.

2009, c. 701.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2023 · leading case: Tyrus H. Thompson & Ja'Ree C. Thompson v. Fairfax Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs., 747 S.E.2d 838 (Va. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tyrus H. Thompson & Ja'Ree C. Thompson v. Fairfax Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs., 747 S.E.2d 838 (Va. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “In addition, it is not clear to what extent the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (UIDDA), as codified at Code § 8.01-412.8 to -412.15, applies to a tribe.”
Rahofy v. Steadman, 2010 UT App 350 (Utah Ct. App. 2010). “Virginia has adopted the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, see Va.Code Ann. §§ 8.01-412.8 to 412.15 (2010), which Utah has also adopted, see Utah Code Ann.”
Dakshay Patel v. Jonathan I. Rabinowitz ex rel. Lakhani Assocs., LLC (Va. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “We consider here whether a judgment creditor may use the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (UIDDA), Code §§ 8.01-412.8 to 8.01-412.15, to serve an out-of-state document subpoena on third parties in Virginia when the judgment creditor only suspects that those third…”
Hadeed Carpet Cleaning, Inc. v. Doe, 86 Va. Cir. 59 (Alexandria Cir. Ct. 2012). · cites it 3× “See Va. Code §§ 8.01-412.8 et seq. That avenue, however, is not the exclusive means to obtain discoveiy on foreign corporations and other lawful methods remain alternatives to the UIDDA.”
Nancy J. Martin, as Guardian ad litem v. Fairfax Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs. (Va. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “In addition, it is not clear to what extent the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (UIDDA), as codified at Code § 8.01-412.8 to -412.15, applies to a tribe.”
Minh-Sang Nguyen v. Fairfax Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs. (Va. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “In addition, it is not clear to what extent the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (UIDDA), as codified at Code § 8.01-412.8 to -412.15, applies to a tribe.”
Jasmine Vanderplas v. Fairfax Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs. (Va. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “In addition, it is not clear to what extent the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act (UIDDA), as codified at Code § 8.01-412.8 to -412.15, applies to a tribe.”
Yelp, Inc. v. Hadeed Carpet Cleaning (Va. 2015). · cites it 2× “5 Nothing in it subtracts from the statutory authority the General Assembly has already provided Virginia courts in Code §§ 1-237, 8.01-2(8), 8.”
Ho-Won Jeong v. George Mason Univ. (Va. Ct. App. 2023). “In March 2022, Jeong obtained a subpoena duces tecum directed to the University under the Uniform Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act, Code §§ 8.01-412.8 through -412.15. On June 3, 2022, the Circuit Court of Fairfax County partially quashed the subpoena.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.