Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-67 (2026)
Definitions; persons under a disability; fiduciary
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The terms "fiduciary" and "person under a disability" as used in this article shall have the meanings ascribed to them in § 8.01-2.
1977, c. 617.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1979–1997 · leading case: Jones v. Jones, 457 S.E.2d 365 (Va. 1995).
Jones v. Jones, 457 S.E.2d 365 (Va. 1995). “01-81 to -93, or by suit for sale of lands of persons under a disability pursuant to Code §§ 8.01-67 to -80. Both of these procedures, Lashi notes, require the trial court to find that sale of the property will promote the interests of its owners.”
Upton v. Hall, 300 S.E.2d 777 (Va. 1983). “The complainants requested that the court either approve the sale of the infants’ land according to the terms of the contract, Code § 8.01-67, et seq., or decree that the land be partitioned, Code § 8.”
Austin v. Dobbins, 252 S.E.2d 588 (Va. 1979). “(now §§ 8.01-67, et seq.,) and in accordance with the long-established rules and standards governing judicial sales.”
Janet v. Rhodes, 20 Va. Cir. 22 (Fauquier Cir. Ct. 1989). “Even if one accepts the proposition that the appropriate suit would have been one under §§ 8.01-67 et seq. (Suits for Sale of Lands of a Person Under a Disability), the partition suit could easily be amended to change into a suit under §§ 8.”
Wilson v. Hood, 10 Va. Cir. 289 (Richmond County Cir. Ct. 1987). “Moreover, the court believes that the statutory scheme embodied in Virginia Code Section 8.01-67 et seq., prescribing the procedure for selling lands of persons under disabilities, is more appropriate in situations such as this than the type of action filed by plaintiff here.”
Carwile v. Carwile, 41 Va. Cir. 319 (Richmond County Cir. Ct. 1997). “Virginia Code § 8.01-67 et seq. prescribes two methods by which real estate of a person under a disability can be transferred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.