Wash. Rev. Code » Title 1 · Chapter 1.04
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 1.04.010 (2026)

Revised Code of Washington enacted

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The ninety-one titles with chapters and sections designated as the "Revised Code of Washington" and attested by the secretary of the senate and the chief clerk of the house of representatives of the legislature of the state of Washington, are hereby enacted and designated as the "Revised Code of Washington." Said code is intended to embrace in a revised, consolidated, and codified form and arrangement all the laws of the state of a general and permanent nature.
[ 1951 c 5 s 2; 1950 ex.s. c 16 s 1.]

Notes:

Creation of new code titles authorized, effect: RCW 1.08.015.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1971–2015 · leading case: Fast v. Kennewick Pub. Hosp. Dist., 354 P.3d 858 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fast v. Kennewick Pub. Hosp. Dist., 354 P.3d 858 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). ““Sections” are numbered according to the plan generally used in the 1950 supplement, using the number of the title, the number of the chapter, and a section part of the number (e.”
City of Seattle v. Fuller, 300 P.3d 340 (Wash. 2013). “RCW 1.04.010. RCW 35.20.250 grants “concurrent jurisdiction with the superior court and district court in all civil and criminal matters as now provided by law for district judges” to municipal courts in cities with populations over 400,000.”
Roulette v. City of Seattle, 850 F. Supp. 1442 (W.D. Wash. 1994). “The Seattle Municipal Code contains a severability clause, found at SMC § 1.04.010. 11 The City itself has stated on numerous occasions, in its written briefs and during oral argument, that the amendment of the ordinance adding the circumstances section “effected no substantive…”
State v. Galen, 487 P.2d 273 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971). “At that time it had the common law meaning described in People v.”
City of Seattle v. Fuller (Wash. 2013). “RCW 1.04.010. 4 No. 86148-0 "superior" was reinserted preceding "court" throughout both RCW 9.”
Shane Fast v. Kennewick Pub. Hosp. Dist. d/b/a Kennewick Gen. Hosp. (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “"Sections" are numbered according to the plan generally used in the 1950 supplement, using the number of the title, the number of the chapter, and a section part of the number (e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.