Wash. Rev. Code » Title 10 · Chapter 10.27
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 10.27.180 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The judge serving as a special inquiry judge shall be disqualified from acting as a magistrate or judge in any subsequent court proceeding arising from such inquiry except alleged contempt for neglect or refusal to appear, testify or provide evidence at such inquiry in response to an order, summons or subpoena.
[ 1971 ex.s. c 67 s 18.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1972–2016 · leading case: State v. Neslund, 690 P.2d 1153 (Wash. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Neslund, 690 P.2d 1153 (Wash. 1984). · cites it 18× “I Defendant first argues that Judge Pitt, as the special inquiry judge for the inquiry into the alleged murder of Rolf Neslund, was disqualified under RCW 10.27.180 from issuing search warrants 2123 and 2123-1.”
State v. Reeder, 365 P.3d 1243 (Wash. 2015). “RCW 10.27.180. Therefore, a subpoena issued by an SIJ, like a subpoena issued by a federal grand jury, can be justified by less than probable cause, and “reason to suspect crime or corruption” is sufficient.”
State v. Madry, 504 P.2d 1156 (Wash. Ct. App. 1972). “] RCW 10.27.180 . . . The judge serving as a special inquiry judge shall be disqualified from acting as a magistrate or judge in any *68 subsequent court proceeding arising from such inquiry except alleged contempt for neglect or refusal to appear, testify or provide evidence at…”
State v. Manning, 543 P.2d 632 (Wash. 1975). “Also, RCW 10.27.180 disqualifies the special inquiry judge from acting in any subsequent court proceedings arising from such inquiry.”
State Of Washington v. Sidney A. Potts (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “5 The applicable statute is RCW 10.27.180. 6 45724-5-II / 46300-8-II III.”
In re Special Inquiry Judge, 899 P.2d 800 (Wash. Ct. App. 1995). “RCW 10.27.180. The affidavit of prejudice, RCW 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.