Wash. Rev. Code » Title 11 · Chapter 11.114
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.114.110 (2026)

Validity and effect of transfer

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The validity of a transfer made in a manner prescribed in this chapter is not affected by:
(a) Failure of the transferor to comply with RCW 11.114.090(3) concerning possession and control;
(b) Designation of an ineligible custodian, except designation of the transferor in the case of property for which the transferor is ineligible to serve as custodian under RCW 11.114.090(1); or
(c) Death or incapacity of a person nominated under RCW 11.114.030 or designated under RCW 11.114.090 as custodian or the disclaimer of the office by that person.
(2) A transfer made pursuant to RCW 11.114.090 is irrevocable, and the custodial property is indefeasibly vested in the minor, but the custodian has all the rights, powers, duties, and authority provided in this chapter, and neither the minor nor the minor's legal representative has any right, power, duty, or authority with respect to the custodial property except as provided in this chapter.
(3) By making a transfer, the transferor incorporates in the disposition all the provisions of this chapter and grants to the custodian, and to any third person dealing with a person designated as custodian, the respective powers, rights, and immunities provided in this chapter.
[ 1991 c 193 s 11.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2003 · leading case: Richards v. Seattle Metro. Credit Union, 68 P.3d 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Richards v. Seattle Metro. Credit Union, 68 P.3d 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “[22] RCW 11.114.110(2). [23] RCW 11.114.120-.130.”
Richards v. Seattle Metro. Credit Union, 68 P.3d 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “RCW 11.114.110(2). RCW 11.114.120, .130. RCW 11.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.114.110(2) — 2 cases
Richards v. Seattle Metro. Credit Union, 68 P.3d 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “[22] RCW 11.114.110(2). [23] RCW 11.114.120-.130.”
Richards v. Seattle Metro. Credit Union, 68 P.3d 1109 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “RCW 11.114.110(2). RCW 11.114.120, .130. RCW 11.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.