Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.98.075 (2026)

Certification of trust

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Instead of furnishing a copy of the trust instrument to a person other than a beneficiary, the trustee may furnish to the person a certification of trust containing the following information:
(a) That the trust exists and the date the trust instrument was executed;
(b) The identity of the trustor;
(c) The identity and address of the currently acting trustee;
(d) Relevant powers of the trustee;
(e) The revocability or irrevocability of the trust and the identity of any person holding a power to revoke the trust;
(f) The authority of cotrustees to sign or otherwise authenticate and whether all or less than all are required in order to exercise powers of the trustee; and
(g) The name of the trust or the titling of the trust property.
(2) A certification of trust may be signed or otherwise authenticated by any trustee or by an attorney for the trust.
(3) A certification of trust must state that the trust has not been revoked, modified, or amended in any manner that would cause the representations contained in the certification of trust to be incorrect.
(4) A certification of trust need not contain the dispositive terms of a trust.
(5) A recipient of a certification of trust may require the trustee to furnish copies of those excerpts from the original trust instrument and later amendments which designate the trustee and confer upon the trustee the power to act in the pending transaction or any other reasonable information.
(6) A person who acts in reliance upon a certification of trust without knowledge that the representations contained therein are incorrect is not liable to any person for so acting and may assume without inquiry the existence of the facts contained in the certification. Knowledge of the terms of the trust may not be inferred solely from the fact that a copy of all or part of the trust instrument is held by the person relying upon the certification.
(7) A person who in good faith enters into a transaction in reliance upon a certification of trust may enforce the transaction against the trust property as if the representations contained in the certification were correct.
(8) A person making a demand for the trust instrument in addition to a certification of trust or excerpts is liable for damages, including reasonable attorney fees, if the court determines that the person did not act in good faith in demanding the trust instrument.
(9) This section does not limit the right of a person to obtain a copy of the trust instrument in a judicial proceeding concerning the trust.
[ 2011 c 327 s 31.]

Notes:

ApplicationEffective date2011 c 327: See notes following RCW 11.103.020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: In Re: The Gordon & Frances Sales Fam. Trust (Wash. Ct. App. 2020).
In Re: The Gordon & Frances Sales Fam. Trust (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 9× “020, (2) using a certification of trust under RCW 11.98.075 to determine the terms of the missing Trust Agreement, (3) re- creating the terms of the missing Trust by interpreting the Abstract, and (4) entering findings of fact which are not supported by substantial evidence and…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.98.075(1) — 1 case
In Re: The Gordon & Frances Sales Fam. Trust (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “020, (2) using a certification of trust under RCW 11.98.075 to determine the terms of the missing Trust Agreement, (3) re- creating the terms of the missing Trust by interpreting the Abstract, and (4) entering findings of fact which are not supported by substantial evidence and…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.98.075(4) — 1 case
In Re: The Gordon & Frances Sales Fam. Trust (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “020, (2) using a certification of trust under RCW 11.98.075 to determine the terms of the missing Trust Agreement, (3) re- creating the terms of the missing Trust by interpreting the Abstract, and (4) entering findings of fact which are not supported by substantial evidence and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.