Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 18.155.010 (2026)
Findings—Construction
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The legislature finds that sex offender therapists who examine and treat sex offenders pursuant to the special sexual [sex] offender sentencing alternative under RCW 9.94A.670 and who may treat juvenile sex offenders pursuant to RCW 13.40.160, play a vital role in protecting the public from sex offenders who remain in the community following conviction. The legislature finds that the qualifications, practices, techniques, and effectiveness of sex offender treatment providers vary widely and that the court's ability to effectively determine the appropriateness of granting the sentencing alternative and monitoring the offender to ensure continued protection of the community is undermined by a lack of regulated practices. The legislature recognizes the right of sex offender therapists to practice, consistent with the paramount requirements of public safety. Public safety is best served by regulating sex offender therapists whose clients are being evaluated and being treated pursuant to RCW 9.94A.670 and 13.40.160. This chapter shall be construed to require only those sex offender therapists who examine and treat sex offenders pursuant to RCW 9.94A.670 and 13.40.160 to obtain a sexual [sex] offender treatment certification as provided in this chapter.
Notes:
Technical correction bill—2000 c 28: See note following RCW 9.94A.015.
Effective date—2000 c 28: See RCW 9.94A.921.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1994–1994 · leading case: State v. SH, 877 P.2d 205 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994).
State v. SH, 877 P.2d 205 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “) RCW 18.155.010. The treatment staff at Maple Lane have no role in "protecting the public from sex offenders who remain in the community".”
State v. S.H., 75 Wash. App. 1 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “) RCW 18.155.010. The treatment staff at Maple Lane have no role in "protecting the public from sex offenders who remain in the community”.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.