Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 2.70.030 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) There is created an advisory committee consisting of the following members:
(a) Three persons appointed by the chief justice of the supreme court, who shall also appoint the chair of the committee;
(b) Two nonattorneys appointed by the governor;
(c) Two senators, one from each of the two largest caucuses, appointed by the president of the senate; and two members of the house of representatives, one from each of the two largest caucuses, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives;
(d) One person appointed by the court of appeals executive committee;
(e) One person appointed by the Washington state bar association;
(f) One person appointed by the Washington state association of counties; and
(g) One person appointed by the association of Washington cities.
(2) During the term of his or her appointment, no appointee may: (a) Provide indigent defense services funded by a city, a county, or the state, except on a pro bono basis; (b) serve as a judge except on a pro tem basis or as a court employee; or (c) serve as a prosecutor or prosecutor employee.
(3) Members of the advisory committee shall receive no compensation for their services as members of the committee, but may be reimbursed for travel and other expenses in accordance with state law.
(4) The advisory committee shall:
(a) Meet at least quarterly;
(b) Review at least biennially the performance of the director, and submit each review to the chief justice of the supreme court;
(c) Receive reports from the director;
(d) Make policy recommendations, as appropriate, to the legislature and the supreme court;
(e) Approve the office's budget requests;
(f) Advise the director regarding administration and oversight of the office's program areas; and
(g) Carry out other duties as authorized or required by law.
Notes:
Findings—2008 c 313: See note following RCW 2.70.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: Kitsap Cnty. v. Moore, 144 Wash. 2d 292 (Wash. 2001).
Kitsap Cnty. v. Moore, 144 Wash. 2d 292 (Wash. 2001). “The advisory committee created by RCW 2.70.030 to *298 establish the Office of Public Defense has representatives from the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, but representatives from the superior courts and courts of limited jurisdiction are conspicuously absent.”
Kitsap Cnty. v. Moore, 26 P.3d 931 (Wash. 2001). “The advisory committee created by RCW 2.70.030 to establish the Office of Public Defense has representatives from the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, but representatives from the superior courts and courts of limited jurisdiction are conspicuously absent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.