Wash. Rev. Code » Title 25 · Chapter 25.05
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 25.05.020 (2026)

Supplemental principles of law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Unless displaced by particular provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity supplement this chapter.
(2) If an obligation to pay interest arises under this chapter and the rate is not specified, the rate is that specified in RCW 19.52.010(1).
[ 1998 c 103 s 104.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2005–2009 · leading case: Horne v. Aune, 121 P.3d 1227 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Horne v. Aune, 121 P.3d 1227 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “" RCW 25.05.020(1). The court's exercise of equitable discretion to grant Horne the right to purchase the property is not inconsistent with the winding-up statute.”
Horne v. Aune, 130 Wash. App. 183 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “” RCW 25.05.020(1). The court’s exercise of equitable discretion to grant Horne the right to purchase the property is not inconsistent with the winding-up statute.”
Simpson v. Thorslund, 151 Wash. App. 276 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “”); see also RCW 25.05.020(1) (“Unless displaced by particular provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity supplement this chapter.”
Simpson v. Thorslund, 211 P.3d 469 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “"); see also RCW 25.05.020(1) ("Unless displaced by particular provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity supplement this chapter.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 25.05.020(1) — 4 cases
Horne v. Aune, 121 P.3d 1227 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “" RCW 25.05.020(1). The court's exercise of equitable discretion to grant Horne the right to purchase the property is not inconsistent with the winding-up statute.”
Horne v. Aune, 130 Wash. App. 183 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “” RCW 25.05.020(1). The court’s exercise of equitable discretion to grant Horne the right to purchase the property is not inconsistent with the winding-up statute.”
Simpson v. Thorslund, 151 Wash. App. 276 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “”); see also RCW 25.05.020(1) (“Unless displaced by particular provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity supplement this chapter.”
Simpson v. Thorslund, 211 P.3d 469 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “"); see also RCW 25.05.020(1) ("Unless displaced by particular provisions of this chapter, the principles of law and equity supplement this chapter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.