Wash. Rev. Code » Title 26 · Chapter 26.51
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 26.51.030 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) A party to a case may request from the court an order restricting abusive litigation if the parties are current or former intimate partners and one party has been found by the court to have committed domestic violence against the other party:
(a) In any answer or response to the litigation being filed, initiated, advanced, or continued;
(b) By motion made at any time during any open or ongoing case; or
(c) By separate motion made under this chapter, within five years of the entry of an order for protection even if the order has since expired.
(2) Any court of competent jurisdiction may, on its own motion, determine that a hearing pursuant to RCW 26.51.040 is necessary to determine if a party is engaging in abusive litigation.
(3) The administrative office of the courts shall update the instructions, brochures, standard petition, and order for protection forms, and create new forms for the motion for order restricting abusive litigation and order restricting abusive litigation, and update the court staff handbook when changes in the law make an update necessary.
(4) No filing fee may be charged to the unrestricted party for proceedings under this section regardless of whether it is filed under this chapter or another action in this title. Forms and instructional brochures shall be provided free of charge.
(5) The provisions of this section are nonexclusive and do not affect any other remedy available.
[ 2020 c 311 s 3.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2025–2026 · leading case: Tayme Rose-leavitt, V. Rand Workman (Wash. Ct. App. 2025).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tayme Rose-leavitt, V. Rand Workman (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “” RCW 26.51.030(1). When a party moves for an order restricting abusive litigation, the court must “attempt to verify that the parties have or previously had an intimate partner relationship and that the party raising the claim of abusive litigation has been found to be a victim…”
Nicholas Cabral v. Dustin Glinski (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “” RCW 26.51.030(1). When a party moves for an order 6 No.”
Beth Anne Cabral v. Dustin Glinski (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “” RCW 26.51.030(1). When a party moves for an order 6 No.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 26.51.030(1) — 3 cases
Tayme Rose-leavitt, V. Rand Workman (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “” RCW 26.51.030(1). When a party moves for an order restricting abusive litigation, the court must “attempt to verify that the parties have or previously had an intimate partner relationship and that the party raising the claim of abusive litigation has been found to be a victim…”
Nicholas Cabral v. Dustin Glinski (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “” RCW 26.51.030(1). When a party moves for an order 6 No.”
Beth Anne Cabral v. Dustin Glinski (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “” RCW 26.51.030(1). When a party moves for an order 6 No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.