Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.335.110 (2026)

Real property—Annexation to city or town

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to other powers and duties as provided by law, every board of directors, if seeking to have school property annexed to a city or town and if such school property constitutes the whole of such property in the annexation petition, shall be allowed to petition therefor under RCW 35.13.125 and 35.13.130.

[ 1971 c 69 s 3. Formerly RCW 28A.58.044.]

Notes:

Severability—1971 c 69: See note following RCW 35.13.125.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2004 · leading case: King Cnty. Water Dist. No. 90 v. City of Renton, 944 P.2d 1067 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

King Cnty. Water Dist. No. 90 v. City of Renton, 944 P.2d 1067 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 13× “110 does not place limitations on a school district’s authority to petition for annexation of school property, we conclude otherwise. The plain language of the statute conditions a school district’s authority to petition for annexation on the presence of one primary factor: the…”

Snohomish Cnty. Fire Prot. Dist. No. 1 v. Washington State Boundary Review Bd., 87 P.3d 1187 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Prior to the circulation of a petition for annexation, the initiating party or parties who, except as provided in RCW 28A.335.110, shall be either not less than ten percent of the residents of the area to be annexed or the owners of not less than ten percent in value, according…”

Snohomish Cnty. Fire Prot. Dist. v. Brb, 87 P.3d 1187 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “110, shall be either not less than ten percent of the residents of the area to be annexed or the owners of not less than ten percent in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation of the property for which annexation is petitioned, shall notify the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.