Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 28B.52.030 (2026)
Representatives of employee organization—Right to collective bargaining
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Representatives of an employee organization, which organization shall by secret ballot have won a majority in an election to represent the academic employees within its college district, shall have the right to bargain.
[ 2019 c 230 s 3; 1991 c 238 s 147; 1987 c 314 s 3; 1973 1st ex.s. c 205 s 2; 1971 ex.s. c 196 s 3.]
Notes:
Severability—1973 1st ex.s. c 205: See note following RCW 28B.52.020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1973–1993 · leading case: Shoreline Cmty. Coll. Dist. No. 7 v. Emp. Sec. Dep't, 842 P.2d 938 (Wash. 1993).
Shoreline Cmty. Coll. Dist. No. 7 v. Emp. Sec. Dep't, 842 P.2d 938 (Wash. 1993). “" Former RCW 28B.52.030. The "hours-allowed" formula was a legitimate subject for bargaining within the terms of the statute.”
Columbia Basin Coll. Ass'n of Higher Educ. v. Bd. of Trs. of Columbia Basin Coll., 557 P.2d 852 (Wash. 1976). “RCW 28B.52.030 provides in part: Representatives of an employee organization, .”
Greenwood v. State Bd. for Cmty. Coll. Educ., 513 P.2d 57 (Wash. 1973). “Under RCW 28B.52.030, the faculty'» association is authorized to represent its membership in negotiations with the local board concerning proposed community college policies relating to, but not limited to, salaries and salary schedules.”
Greenwood v. State Bd. for Com. Col., 513 P.2d 57 (Wash. 1973). “Under RCW 28B.52.030, the faculty association is authorized to represent its membership in negotiations with the local board concerning proposed community college policies relating to, but not limited to, salaries and salary schedules.”
Columbia Basin Coll. Ass'n of Higher Educ. v. Bd. of Trs. of Columbia Basin Coll., 568 P.2d 796 (Wash. 1977). “RCW 28B.52.030 provides: Representatives of an employee organization, which organization shall by secret ballot have won a majority in an election to represent the academic employees within its community college district, shall have the right, after using established…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.