Wash. Rev. Code § 35.58.210

Metropolitan water pollution abatement advisory committee

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a metropolitan municipal corporation shall be authorized to perform the function of metropolitan water pollution abatement, the metropolitan council shall, prior to the effective date of the assumption of such function, cause a metropolitan water pollution abatement advisory committee to be formed by notifying the legislative body of each component city and county which operates a sewer system to appoint one person to serve on such advisory committee and the board of commissioners of each water-sewer district which operates a sewer system, any portion of which lies within the metropolitan area, to appoint one person to serve on such committee. The metropolitan water pollution abatement advisory committee shall meet at the time and place provided in the notice and elect a chair. The members of such committee shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing bodies and shall receive no compensation other than reimbursement for expenses actually incurred in the performance of their duties. The function of such advisory committee shall be to advise the metropolitan council in matters relating to the performance of the water pollution abatement function.

[ 2011 c 124 s 1; 2009 c 549 s 2103; 1999 c 153 s 33; 1974 ex.s. c 70 s 7; 1965 c 7 s 35.58.210. Prior: 1957 c 213 s 21.]

Notes:

Part headings not law—1999 c 153: See note following RCW 57.04.050.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 2007–2013 · leading case: Public Utility District No. 2 v. North American Foreign Trade Zone Industries, LLC

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Public Utility District No. 2 v. North American Foreign Trade Zone Industries, LLC (2007) wash “005 (water-sewer districts); RCW 81.112.080-.090 (regional transit authorities).”

Cedar River Water & Sewer District v. King County (2013) wash “an advisory body created under RCW 35.58.210. [Its] function is to ‘advise the metropolitan council in matters relating to the performance of water pollution abatement function.”

Pud v. Naftzi (2007) wash “090 (regional transit authorities). [13] RCW 54.16.020 states, in pertinent part, that "[t]he right of eminent domain shall be exercised pursuant to resolution of the commission and conducted in the same manner and by the same procedures as is provided for the exercise of that…”

Cedar River Water & Sewer Dist. v. King County (2013) wash “an advisory body created under RCW 35.58.210. [Its] function is to 'advise the metropolitan council in matters relating to the performance ofwater pollution abatement function.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.