Wash. Rev. Code » Title 36 · Chapter 36.70
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70.620 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon receipt of any recommended official control or amendment thereto, the board shall at its next regular public meeting set the date for a public meeting where it may, by ordinance, adopt or reject the official control or amendment.
[ 1963 c 4 s 36.70.620. Prior: 1959 c 201 s 62.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1974–1997 · leading case: Citizens for Responsible Gov't v. Kitsap Cnty., 758 P.2d 1009 (Wash. Ct. App. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Citizens for Responsible Gov't v. Kitsap Cnty., 758 P.2d 1009 (Wash. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Citizens contends that it is void because the requirements for notice to the public which are prescribed in RCW 36.70.620 and RCW 36.70.630 were not observed by the County before final adoption of the ordinance.”
Tugwell v. Kittitas Cnty., 951 P.2d 272 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “If after considering the matter at a public meeting as provided in RCW 36.70.620 the board deems a change in the recommendations of the planning agency to be necessary, the change shall not be incorporated in the recommended control until the board shall conduct its own public…”
Leavitt v. Jefferson Cnty., 875 P.2d 681 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “In full, the statute provides as follows: "If after considering the matter at a public meeting as provided in RCW 36.70.620 the board deems a change in the recommendations of the planning agency to be necessary, the change shall not be incorporated in the recommended control…”
Glaspey & Sons, Inc. v. Conrad, 521 P.2d 1173 (Wash. 1974). “630 authorized it to do so: If after considering the matter at a public meeting as provided in RCW 36.70.620 the board deems a change in the recommendations of the planning agency to be necessary, the change shall not be incorporated in the recommended control until the board…”
Save Our State Park v. Bd. of Clallam Cnty. Commissioners, 875 P.2d 673 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “) It also relies on RCW 36.70.620 and .650, which provide for various determinations by the Board, as well as RCW 36.”
Byers v. Bd. of Clallam Cy. Comm'rs, 529 P.2d 823 (Wash. 1974). “If after considering the matter at a public meeting as provided in RCW 36.70.620 the board deems a change in the recommendations of the planning agency to be necessary, the change shall not be incorporated in the recommended control until the board shall conduct its own public…”
Jablinske v. Snohomish Cnty., 626 P.2d 543 (Wash. Ct. App. 1981). “See also RCW 36.70.620. RCW 36.70.320-.350 define comprehensive plans and RCW 36.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.