Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 41.26.075 (2026)

Provisions applicable to plan 1

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2034-S2.SL) ***

RCW 41.26.080 through 41.26.3903 shall apply only to members of plan 1.

[ 1992 c 72 s 3; 1991 c 35 s 101.]

Notes:

Intent—1991 c 35: See note following RCW 41.26.005.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Erik T. Salisbury, Et Ano, V. City Of Seattle, Et Ano, 522 P.3d 1019 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Erik T. Salisbury, Et Ano, V. City Of Seattle, Et Ano, 522 P.3d 1019 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “RCW 41.26.075, .120. The claimant received the pension notwithstanding the jury’s apparent conclusion that he lost 35 For the current opinion, go to https://www.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.