Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 42.30.030 (2026)
Meetings declared open and public
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) All meetings of the governing body of a public agency shall be open and public and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the governing body of a public agency, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
(2) Public agencies are encouraged to provide for the increased ability of the public to observe and participate in the meetings of governing bodies through real-time telephonic, electronic, internet, or other readily available means of remote access that do not require an additional cost to access the meeting.
Notes:
Findings—Intent—2022 c 115: See note following RCW 42.30.230.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 57
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case: Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Acct. Now, 82 P.3d 1199 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004).
Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Acct. Now, 82 P.3d 1199 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “See RCW 42.30.030 (“All meetings of the governing body of a public agency shall be open and public .”
Miller v. City of Tacoma, 979 P.2d 429 (Wash. 1999). “To analyze compliance with the act in the present case, we must therefore consider whether (1) the executive session falls within the definition of "meeting" under the act, and (2), if so, whether one of the act's exceptions applies.”
Miller v. City of Tacoma, 138 Wash. 2d 318 (Wash. 1999). “To analyze compliance with the act in the present case, we must therefore consider whether (1) the executive session falls within the definition of “meeting” under the act, and (2), if so, whether one of the act’s exceptions applies.”
Refai v. Cent. Washington Univ., 742 P.2d 137 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987). “" (Italics ours.) *11 The terms "governing body" and "public agency" are defined in former RCW 42.”
In re the Recall of Lakewood City Council Members, 144 Wash. 2d 583 (Wash. 2001). “110(1)(i): that merely the presence of an attorney is not in itself sufficient to justify an executive session.”
In Re Recall of Lakewood City Council, 30 P.3d 474 (Wash. 2001). “Most alarmingly, the majority frustrates the clear open meeting requirement expressed in RCW 42.30.030. This provision is the very foundation of the OPMA.”
Estey v. Dempsey, 707 P.2d 1338 (Wash. 1985). “RCW 42.30.030. Meeting is defined in RCW 42.”
Teaford v. Howard, 707 P.2d 1327 (Wash. 1985). “RCW 42.30.030. "Meeting" is defined in RCW 42.”
Donna Zink & Jeff Zink v. City of Mesa, 487 P.3d 902 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “City of Mesa ANALYSIS Open Public Meetings Act The OPMA provides “[a]ll meetings of the governing body of a public agency shall be open and public and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the governing body of a public agency, except as otherwise provided in…”
Wood v. Battle Ground Sch. Dist., 27 P.3d 1208 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “Failure to comply subjects members to civil penalties: (1) Each member of the governing body who attends a meeting of such governing body where action is taken in violation of any provision of this chapter applicable to him, with knowledge of the fact that the meeting is in…”
Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders, 82 P.3d 1199 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “[105] See RCW 42.30.030 ("All meetings of the governing body of a public agency shall be open and public") (emphasis added); RCW 42.”
Citizens All. for Prop. Rights Legal Fund v. San Juan Cnty., 359 P.3d 753 (Wash. 2015). “Statutory construction ¶13 RCW 42.30.030 sets forth the OPMA’s prohibition against closed public meetings: All meetings of the governing body of a public agency shall be open and public and all persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the governing body of a public…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 42.30.030(1) — 4 cases
Donna Zink, et ux v. City of Mesa (Wash. Ct. App. 2024).
Donna Zink, et ux v. City of Mesa (Wash. Ct. App. 2024).
Arthur West, V. Lower Duwamish Waterway Grp. (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
Arthur West, V. City Of Burien (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.