Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 43.21H.010 (2026)

Purpose

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this chapter is to assert that it is the intent of the legislature that economic values are given appropriate consideration along with environmental, social, health, and safety considerations in the promulgation of rules by state and local government.

[1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 117 s 1.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2013 · leading case: Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 11 P.3d 726 (Wash. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 11 P.3d 726 (Wash. 2000). “005 (describing policy of water use yielding maximum net benefits from both diversionary use of waters and retention of water instream to protect natural values and rights); RCW 90.”

Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 142 Wash. 2d 68 (Wash. 2000). “030(2)(b) (State Environmental Policy Act); RCW 43.21H.010 (state economic policy act).”

Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Dep't of Ecology, 311 P.3d 6 (Wash. 2013). “030(2)(b) (State Environmental Policy Act [of 1971]); RCW 43.21H.010 (state economic policy act).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.