Wash. Rev. Code » Title 46 · Chapter 46.20
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 46.20.380 (2026)

Fee

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No person may file an application for an occupational driver's license, a temporary restricted driver's license, or an ignition interlock driver's license as provided in RCW 46.20.391 and 46.20.385 unless he or she first pays to the director or other person authorized to accept applications and fees for driver's licenses a fee of one hundred dollars. The applicant shall receive upon payment an official receipt for the payment of such fee. All such fees shall be forwarded to the director who shall transmit such fees to the state treasurer in the same manner as other driver's license fees.
[ 2008 c 282 s 5; 2004 c 95 s 6; 1985 ex.s. c 1 s 6; 1979 c 61 s 12; 1967 c 32 s 31; 1961 c 12 s 46.20.380. Prior: 1957 c 268 s 1.]

Notes:

Effective date—2008 c 282: See note following RCW 46.20.308.
Effective date—1985 ex.s. c 1: See note following RCW 46.20.070.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2013 · leading case: Roseborough v. Commonwealth, 688 S.E.2d 882 (Va. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roseborough v. Commonwealth, 688 S.E.2d 882 (Va. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “The Washington implied consent statute, RCW § 46.20.380(1), was similar to the Virginia statute in that a person was "deemed to have given consent" to take the test if he drove on the public highways and if he was arrested for driving while intoxicated.”
Kai Nielsen v. Dep't Of Licensing (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “See RCW 46.20.380 (providing that no person may file an application for an IIDL without first paying to the Department"a fee of one hundred dollars").”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 46.20.380(1) — 1 case
Roseborough v. Commonwealth, 688 S.E.2d 882 (Va. Ct. App. 2010). “The Washington implied consent statute, RCW § 46.20.380(1), was similar to the Virginia statute in that a person was "deemed to have given consent" to take the test if he drove on the public highways and if he was arrested for driving while intoxicated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.