Wash. Rev. Code » Title 46 · Chapter 46.80
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 46.80.005 (2025)

Legislative declaration

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The legislature finds and declares that the distribution and sale of vehicle parts in the state of Washington vitally affects the general economy of the state and the public interest and the public welfare, and that in order to promote the public interest and the public welfare and in the exercise of its police power, it is necessary to regulate and license vehicle wreckers and dismantlers, the buyers-for-resale, and the sellers of secondhand vehicle components doing business in Washington, in order to prevent the sale of stolen vehicle parts, to prevent frauds, impositions, and other abuses, and to preserve the investments and properties of the citizens of this state.
[ 1995 c 256 s 3; 1977 ex.s. c 253 s 1.]

Notes:

Severability—1977 ex.s. c 253: "If any provision of this 1977 amendatory act is declared unconstitutional, or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the constitutionality of the remainder of the amendatory act and the applicability thereof to persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby." [ 1977 ex.s. c 253 s 14.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1982–1997 · leading case: Anderson v. Valley Quality Homes, Inc., 928 P.2d 1143 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anderson v. Valley Quality Homes, Inc., 928 P.2d 1143 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “”), RCW 46.80.005 (public interest in sales of motor vehicle parts), and RCW 48.”
Campbell v. Seattle Engine Rebuilders & Remanufacturing, Inc., 876 P.2d 948 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “See also RCW 46.80.005 (public interest in sales of motor vehicle parts); RCW 48.”
Zahradnik v. Dep't of Licensing, 644 P.2d 742 (Wash. Ct. App. 1982). “" RCW 46.80.005. The manifest purpose of the record-keeping scheme imposed by RCW 46.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.