Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.01.150 (2026)

Particular provisions prevail

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Provisions of this code relating to a particular kind of insurance or a particular type of insurer or to a particular matter prevail over provisions relating to insurance in general or insurers in general or to such matter in general.
[1947 c 79 s .01.15; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 45.01.15.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: Bailey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 869 P.2d 1110 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994).
Bailey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 869 P.2d 1110 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “291’s 20-day rule, it broadened the types of policies that fall under that statute. RCW 48 also contains its own rule for interpretation, expressly providing that provisions relating to a particular kind of insurance prevail over provisions relating to insurance in general.”
Gomez v. Life Ins. Co. of North Am., 928 P.2d 1153 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “12 RCW 48.01.150. See Bailey v. Allstate Ins.”
Washington Cities Ins. Auth. v. Ironshore Indem. Inc (W.D. Wash. 2020). · cites it 2× “Thus, under RCW 48.01.150, Ironshore contends that 20 these more specific provisions prevail over the arbitration provision in RCW 48.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.