Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 49.26.010 (2026)
Legislative declaration
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Airborne asbestos dust and particles, such as those from sprayed asbestos slurry, asbestos-coated ventilating ducts, and certain other applications of asbestos are known to produce irreversible lung damage and bronchogenic carcinoma. One American of every four dying in urban areas of the United States has asbestos particles or dust in his or her lungs. The nature of this problem is such as to constitute a hazard to the public health and safety, and should be brought under appropriate regulation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2006–2014 · leading case: Prezant Assocs., Inc. v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 165 P.3d 12 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
Prezant Assocs., Inc. v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 165 P.3d 12 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “” RCW 49.26.010. Violation of the Health and Safety-Asbestos Act is enforced under WISHA.”
Netversant Wireless Sys. v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., 133 Wash. App. 813 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “” RCW 49.26.010. See State v. Johnson, 119 Wn.”
Netversant Wireless Sys. v. Dept. of Labor & Indus., 138 P.3d 161 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “" RCW 49.26.010. [23] See State v. Johnson, 119 Wash.”
Bnbuilders Inc. v. Wa State Dep't Of Labor & Indus. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “11 A court abuses its discretion where its decision is arbitrary or rests on untenable grounds or reasons.”
Prezant Assocs., Inc. v. Dep't, 165 P.3d 12 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “" RCW 49.26.010. Violation of the Health and Safety Asbestos Act is enforced under WISHA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.