Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 5.45.010 (2025)
"Business" defined
✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The term "business" shall include every kind of business, profession, occupation, calling or operation of institutions, whether carried on for profit or not.
[ 1947 c 53 s 1; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 1263-1. Formerly RCW 5.44.100.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1962–2024 · leading case: Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Rec., Inc., 519 P.2d 278 (Wash. Ct. App. 1974).
Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Rec., Inc., 519 P.2d 278 (Wash. Ct. App. 1974). “RCW 5.45.010 et seq. The trial court excluded exhibit J because defendants were unable to establish that the tally sheets were complete and covered the entire February inventory.”
Benjamin v. Havens, Inc., 373 P.2d 109 (Wash. 1962). “RCW 5.45.010, the Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act, defines “business” as: “.”
Wolff v. Coast Engine Prods., Inc., 432 P.2d 562 (Wash. 1967). “The first relates to the admission of parts of exhibit No. 1, the hospital record; and the last to the refusal to grant a new trial.”
State v. Lee, 247 P.3d 470 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “[65] ER 803(6); RCW 5.45.010, .020. [66] Kronich, 160 Wash.”
State v. Heggins, 779 P.2d 285 (Wash. Ct. App. 1989). “Fligner, who actually performed the autopsy. The State responds that Reay's testimony was *596 admissible as an accompaniment to a business record under RCW 5.”
State v. Lee, 159 Wash. App. 795 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “ER 803(a)(6); RCW 5.45.010, .020. Kronich, 160 Wn.2d at 902 (citing Crawford, 541 U.”
State Of Washington v. William Richard Rodgers, No. 72934-9 (Wash. Ct. App. Aug. 1, 2016). “IV Rodgers next contends that his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation was violated when records related to his Google account were authenticated based on a business records certification letter written by a Google employee who did not testify.”
State of Washington v. Cory Blake Benson, No. 39773-4 (Wash. Ct. App. Sept. 27, 2024). “(c) Business records Where an entity in the regular course of business produces a record of an act or event, and where the entity produces such a record at or near the time of the act or event, that record is admissible if properly authenticated.”
Cox v. Funk, 368 P.2d 694 (Wash. 1962). “RCW 5.45.010, et seq. Defendants have abandoned this argument on appeal; we need not consider it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.