Wash. Rev. Code » Title 53 · Chapter 53.08
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 53.08.310 (2025)

Moorage facilities—Definitions

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this section, RCW 53.08.480, and 53.08.320.
(1) "Moorage facility" means any properties or facilities owned or operated by a moorage facility operator which are capable of use for the moorage or storage of vessels.
(2) "Moorage facility operator" means any port district, city, town, metropolitan park district, or county which owns and/or operates a moorage facility.
(3) "Owner" means every natural person, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or organization, or agent thereof, with actual or apparent authority, who expressly or impliedly contracts for use of a moorage facility.
(4) "Port charges" mean charges of a moorage facility operator for moorage and storage, and all other charges owing or to become owing under a contract between a vessel owner and the moorage facility operator, or under an officially adopted tariff including, but not limited to, costs of sale and related legal expenses.
(5) "Transient vessel" means a vessel using a moorage facility and which belongs to an owner who does not have a moorage agreement with the moorage facility operator. Transient vessels include, but are not limited to: Vessels seeking a harbor of refuge, day use, or overnight use of a moorage facility on a space-as-available basis. Transient vessels may also include vessels taken into custody under RCW 79.100.040.
(6) "Vessel" means every species of watercraft or other artificial contrivance capable of being used as a means of transportation on water and which does not exceed two hundred feet in length. "Vessel" includes any trailer used for the transportation of watercraft.
[ 2014 c 195 s 205; 1986 c 260 s 1; 1983 c 188 s 1.]

Notes:

Reviser's note: The definitions in this section have been alphabetized pursuant to RCW 1.08.015(2)(k).
Findings—Intent—2014 c 195: See notes following RCW 79.100.170 and 79.100.180.
Construction—Savings—1983 c 188: "Nothing contained in RCW 53.08.310 and 53.08.320 may be construed as a limitation of any rights, privileges, or remedies previously existing under any applicable laws of port districts, cities, towns, metropolitan park districts, or counties." [ 1983 c 188 s 3.]
Severability—1983 c 188: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1983 c 188 s 5.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case: Marc Landry, V Port Of Port Townsend, No. 49617-8 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marc Landry, V Port Of Port Townsend, No. 49617-8 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2018). · cites it 2× “The derelict vessel agreement also stated that the “deposit required herein shall be considered a “Port Charge” as defined by RCW 53.08.310(1).” CP at 140. B. LANDRY’S SUIT AGAINST THE PORT On May 23, 2016, Landry filed a complaint against the Port, the Port’s Executive Director…”
Port of Seattle v. Wang, No. 2:24-cv-00735 (W.D. Wash. July 30, 2025). “23 Pursuant to the Port’s obligations as a moorage facility operator under RCW 53.08.310(2) 24 and RCW 53.08.320, the Port published Moorage Tariff No.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 53.08.310(1): 1 case
Marc Landry, V Port Of Port Townsend, No. 49617-8 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2018). “The derelict vessel agreement also stated that the “deposit required herein shall be considered a “Port Charge” as defined by RCW 53.08.310(1).” CP at 140. B. LANDRY’S SUIT AGAINST THE PORT On May 23, 2016, Landry filed a complaint against the Port, the Port’s Executive Director…”
Wash. Rev. Code § 53.08.310(2): 1 case
Port of Seattle v. Wang, No. 2:24-cv-00735 (W.D. Wash. July 30, 2025). “23 Pursuant to the Port’s obligations as a moorage facility operator under RCW 53.08.310(2) 24 and RCW 53.08.320, the Port published Moorage Tariff No.”
Wash. Rev. Code § 53.08.310(3): 1 case
Marc Landry, V Port Of Port Townsend, No. 49617-8 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2018). “The derelict vessel agreement also stated that the “deposit required herein shall be considered a “Port Charge” as defined by RCW 53.08.310(1).” CP at 140. B. LANDRY’S SUIT AGAINST THE PORT On May 23, 2016, Landry filed a complaint against the Port, the Port’s Executive Director…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.