Wash. Rev. Code » Title 59 · Chapter 59.12

Wash. Rev. Code § 59.12.050

Jurisdiction of proceedings

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The superior court of the county in which the property or some part of it is situated shall have jurisdiction of proceedings under this chapter.
[ 1891 c 96 s 6; RRS s 815. Prior: 1890 p 75 s 5.]

Notes:

Venue and jurisdiction, generally: RCW 2.08.010 and chapter 4.12 RCW.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2024 · leading case: Housing Authority of City of Seattle v. Bin
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Housing Authority of City of Seattle v. Bin (2011) washctapp · cites it 2× “” RCW 59.12.050. Furthermore, superior courts have broad general jurisdiction over real estate disputes.”
TACOMA RESCUE MISSION v. Stewart (2010) washctapp · cites it 2× “" RCW 59.12.050. Furthermore, superior courts have broad general jurisdiction over real estate disputes.”
Tacoma Rescue Mission v. Stewart (2010) washctapp · cites it 2× “” RCW 59.12.050. Furthermore, superior courts have broad general jurisdiction over real estate disputes.”
Hall v. Feigenbaum (2014) washctapp “RCW 59.12.050. Superior courts have broad general jurisdiction over real estate disputes.”
Wells Fargo Bank v. Daniel G. Szmania (2019) washctapp · cites it 2× “RCW 59.12.050 vests the superior court of the county 6 No.”
Michelle J. Kinnucan v. City Of Seattle (2016) washctapp “Contrary to Kinnucan's position, the TRAO's limitations regarding unlawful detainer actions are entirely consistent with RCW 59.”
John Scannell v. Georgiy Bulkhak (2019) washctapp “” RCW 59.12.050. The property is located in Kitsap County.”
Johnson v. Surface Services LLC (2024) wawd “RCW 59.12.050. 10 Finally, Johnson asserts that Hodges was served on July 15, 2024.”
Robert K. Hall & Daylight Properties, Resp/cross App v. Matthew Feigenbaum, App/cross Resp (2014) washctapp “12 This jurisdiction "remains constant regardless of procedural missteps by the parties,"13 but a party filing an action after improper notice "'may not maintain such action or avail itself ofthe superior court's jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.