Wash. Rev. Code » Title 61 · Chapter 61.12
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 61.12.080 (2025)

Deficiency judgment—How enforced

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Judgments over for any deficiency remaining unsatisfied after application of the proceeds of sale of mortgaged property, either real or personal, shall be similar in all respects to other judgments for the recovery of money, and may be made a lien upon the property of a judgment debtor as other judgments, and the collections thereof enforced in the same manner.
[Code 1881 s 622; 1877 p 129 s 625; 1869 p 148 s 575; RRS s 1120.]

Notes:

Enforcement of judgments: Title 6 RCW.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1969–2013 · leading case: Gardner v. First Heritage Bank, 175 Wash. App. 650 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gardner v. First Heritage Bank, 175 Wash. App. 650 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “” RCW 61.12.080; see Lassen v. Curtis, 40 Wn.”
In re the Tr.'s Sale of Real Prop. of Giannusa, 282 P.3d 122 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “RCW 61.12.080. ¶11 Initially, our Supreme Court held that RCW 61.”
Damascus Milk Co. v. Morriss, 463 P.2d 212 (Wash. Ct. App. 1969). “RCW 61.12.080. Did the subsequent redemption by the judgment debtor restore the full quality of the original judgment of foreclosure? To answer this question we must interpret RCW 6.”
Roger Gardner, App. v. First Heritage Bank, Res., No. 67375-1 (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2013). “" RCW 61.12.080; see Lassen v. Curtis. 40 Wn.”
Christopher L. Short v. Bank Of Am., No. 68545-7 (Wash. Ct. App. Sept. 23, 2013). “" RCW 61.12.080; see Lassen v. Curtis, 40 Wn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.