Wash. Rev. Code » Title 69 · Chapter 69.50
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.385 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The board must adopt rules providing for an annual licensing procedure of a common carrier who seeks to transport or deliver cannabis, useable cannabis, cannabis concentrates, and cannabis-infused products within the state.
(2) The rules for licensing must:
(a) Establish criteria for considering the approval or denial of a common carrier's original application or renewal application;
(b) Provide minimum qualifications for any employee authorized to drive or operate the transportation or delivery vehicle, including a minimum age of at least twenty-one years;
(c) Address the safety of the employees transporting or delivering the products, including issues relating to the carrying of firearms by such employees;
(d) Address the security of the products being transported, including a system of electronically tracking all products at both the point of pickup and the point of delivery; and
(e) Set reasonable fees for the application and licensing process.
(3) The board may adopt rules establishing the maximum amounts of cannabis, useable cannabis, cannabis concentrates, and cannabis-infused products that may be physically transported or delivered at one time by a common carrier as provided under RCW 69.50.382.
[ 2022 c 16 s 81; 2015 2nd sp.s. c 4 s 502.]

Notes:

Intent—Finding—2022 c 16: See note following RCW 69.50.101.
Findings—Intent—Effective dates—2015 2nd sp.s. c 4: See notes following RCW 69.50.334.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2018–2019 · leading case: State Of Washington v. Leonel Gonzalez (Wash. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Of Washington v. Leonel Gonzalez (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “(b) The possession of marijuana, useable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, and marijuana-infused products being physically transported or delivered within the state, in amounts not exceeding those that may be established under RCW 69.50.385(3), by a licensed employee of a…”
State of Washington v. Enrique Murillo, Jr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “(b) The possession of marijuana, useable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, and marijuana-infused products being physically transported or delivered within the state, in amounts not exceeding those that may be established under RCW 69.50.385(3), by a licensed employee of a…”
State of Washington v. Enrique Murillo, Jr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “(b) The possession of marijuana, useable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, and marijuana-infused products being physically transported or delivered within the state, in amounts not exceeding those that may be established under RCW 69.50.385(3), by a licensed employee of a…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.385(3) — 3 cases
State Of Washington v. Leonel Gonzalez (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “(b) The possession of marijuana, useable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, and marijuana-infused products being physically transported or delivered within the state, in amounts not exceeding those that may be established under RCW 69.50.385(3), by a licensed employee of a…”
State of Washington v. Enrique Murillo, Jr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “(b) The possession of marijuana, useable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, and marijuana-infused products being physically transported or delivered within the state, in amounts not exceeding those that may be established under RCW 69.50.385(3), by a licensed employee of a…”
State of Washington v. Enrique Murillo, Jr. (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “(b) The possession of marijuana, useable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, and marijuana-infused products being physically transported or delivered within the state, in amounts not exceeding those that may be established under RCW 69.50.385(3), by a licensed employee of a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.