Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.903 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act does not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before January 1, 2006.

[ 2005 c 433 s 31.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2010 · leading case: Broom v. Morgan Stanley DW Inc., 236 P.3d 182 (Wash. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Broom v. Morgan Stanley DW Inc., 236 P.3d 182 (Wash. 2010). “[2] The superior court incorrectly relied on the current arbitration statute, the revised uniform arbitration act (RUAA), chapter 7.”

Broom v. Morgan Stanley DW, Inc., 169 Wash. 2d 231 (Wash. 2010). “The superior court incorrectly relied on the current arbitration statute, the revised uniform arbitration act (RUAA), chapter 7.”

Fluor Enter., Inc. v. Walter Constr., Ltd., 141 Wash. App. 761 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 7.04A.903. Washington’s rule mirrors the identical federal rule, Fed.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.