Wash. Rev. Code » Title 70 · Chapter 70.395

Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.100

Facilities excluded

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
RCW 70.395.040 through 70.395.080 do not apply to a private detention facility that is:
(1) Providing counseling, treatment, mental health, educational, or medical services to juveniles under chapter 74.15 RCW;
(2) Providing evaluation and treatment or forensic services to a person who has been civilly detained or is subject to an order of commitment by a court pursuant to chapter 10.77, 71.05, 71.09, or 71.34 RCW, or similarly applicable federal law, including facilities regulated under chapters 70.41, 71.12, and 71.24 RCW;
(3) Used for the quarantine or isolation of persons for public health reasons pursuant to RCW 43.20.050, or similarly applicable federal law;
(4) Used for work release under chapter 72.65 RCW, or similarly applicable federal law;
(5) Used for extraordinary medical placement;
(6) Used for residential substance use disorder treatment; or
(7) Owned and operated by federally recognized tribes and contracting with a government.
[ 2025 c 235 s 7; 2023 c 419 s 10.]

Notes:

Effective date—Construction—2025 c 235: See notes following RCW 70.395.020.
Effective date—Construction—2023 c 419: See notes following RCW 42.56.475.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2024–2026 · leading case: The GEO Group Inc v. Inslee
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
The GEO Group Inc v. Inslee (2024) wawd · cites it 5× “10 Finally, HB 1470 § 10 (codified as RCW 70.395.100) excludes various facilities 11 from HB 1470’s requirements.”
The GEO Group Inc v. Inslee (2024) wawd “19 RCW 70.395.100. 20 The Court explained that “[t]he exclusion of these facilities from HB 1470’s 21 requirements begs the question: What facilities aside from private immigration detention 22 1 facilities are subject to HB 1470? The State provides no answer.”
The Geo Group, Inc. v. Inslee (2026) ca9 “See Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.100 . In creating this mismatch, the panel ignores both our circuit precedent and common sense.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.100(1) — 1 case
The GEO Group Inc v. Inslee (2024) wawd “10 Finally, HB 1470 § 10 (codified as RCW 70.395.100) excludes various facilities 11 from HB 1470’s requirements.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.100(2) — 1 case
The GEO Group Inc v. Inslee (2024) wawd “10 Finally, HB 1470 § 10 (codified as RCW 70.395.100) excludes various facilities 11 from HB 1470’s requirements.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 70.395.100(6) — 1 case
The GEO Group Inc v. Inslee (2024) wawd “10 Finally, HB 1470 § 10 (codified as RCW 70.395.100) excludes various facilities 11 from HB 1470’s requirements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.