Wash. Rev. Code » Title 77 · Chapter 77.04
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 77.04.010 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This title is known and may be cited as "Fish and Wildlife Code of the State of Washington."
[ 2000 c 107 s 201; 1990 c 84 s 1; 1980 c 78 s 2; 1955 c 36 s 77.04.010. Prior: 1947 c 275 s 1; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 5992-11.]

Notes:

Effective date—1980 c 78: "This act shall take effect on July 1, 1981." [ 1980 c 78 s 137.]
Intent, construction—1980 c 78: "In enacting this 1980 act, it is the intent of the legislature to revise and reorganize the game code of this state to clarify and improve the administration of the state's game laws. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the revisions made to the game code by this act are not to be construed as substantive." [ 1980 c 78 s 1.]
Savings—1980 c 78: "This act shall not have the effect of terminating or in any way modifying any proceeding or liability, civil or criminal, which exists on the effective date of this act." [ 1980 c 78 s 138.]
Severability—1980 c 78: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1980 c 78 s 139.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2022 · leading case: State v. Mierz, 901 P.2d 286 (Wash. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Mierz, 901 P.2d 286 (Wash. 1995). · cites it 2× “RCW 77.04.010, as amended by Laws of 1955, ch.”
Twin Harbors Fish & Wildlife Advocacy, V State Fish & Wildlife (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “013, expressing the legislature’s findings and intent, provides, in pertinent part: It is also the intent of the legislature to provide to the commission the authority to review and approve department agreements, to review and approve the department’s budget proposals, to adopt…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.