Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 80.36.010 (2026)
Eminent domain
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The right of eminent domain is hereby extended to all telecommunications companies organized or doing business in this state.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1978–2006 · leading case: Jewell v. Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 585 P.2d 1167 (Wash. 1978).
Jewell v. Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 585 P.2d 1167 (Wash. 1978). “RCW 80.36.010. In return they are regulated extensively by the commission, including most importantly the rate structure which they may charge their customers.”
Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Ass'n, 126 P.3d 16 (Wash. 2006). “RCW 80.36.010 implements this constitutional grant of eminent domain power.”
Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Ass'n, 91 P.3d 104 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “It also has provided in pertinent part: Any telecommunications company, or the lessees thereof, doing business in this state, shall have the right to construct and maintain all necessary telecommunications lines for public traffic along and upon any public road, street or…”
Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Ass'n, 121 Wash. App. 714 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004). “It also has provided in pertinent part: Any telecommunications company, or the lessees thereof, doing business in this state, shall have the right to construct and maintain all necessary telecommunications lines for public traffic along and upon any public road, street or…”
Wita v. Wutc, 41 P.3d 1212 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 153 (10); *1222 RCW 80.36.010. USCC is either the majority owner or sole owner of the entities that hold the wireless licenses.”
Kershaw Sunnyside Ranches, Inc. v. Yakima Interurban Lines Assoc., 126 P.3d 16 (Wash. 2006). “RCW 80.36.010 implements this constitutional grant of eminent domain power.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.