Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 84.52.030 (2026)

Time of levy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
For the purpose of raising revenue for state, county, and other taxing district purposes, the county legislative authority of each county, and all other officials or boards authorized by law to levy taxes for taxing district purposes, must levy taxes on all the taxable property in the county or district, as the case may be, sufficient for such purposes, and within the limitations permitted by law.
[ 2010 c 106 s 312; 1994 c 124 s 38; 1961 c 15 s 84.52.030. Prior: 1927 c 303 s 1; 1925 ex.s. c 130 s 77; RRS s 11238; prior: 1903 c 165 s 1; 1897 c 71 s 63; 1893 c 124 s 64; 1890 p 559 s 78; Code 1881 s 2880.]

Notes:

Effective date2010 c 106: See note following RCW 35.102.145.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1953–1992 · leading case: Cnty. of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, 502 U.S. 251 (1992).
Cnty. of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, 502 U.S. 251 (1992). · cites it 2× “Wash. Rev. Code §§ 84.52.030 , 82.45.070 (1989).”
Dep't of Revenue v. Hoppe, 512 P.2d 1094 (Wash. 1973). · cites it 2× “RCW 84.52.030 establishes the time a levy is to be made and places date limits for such enactment on "the board of county commissioners of each county .”
Longview Fibre Co. v. Cowlitz Cnty., 777 P.2d 556 (Wash. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “020 and RCW 84.52.030. The officials responsible for imposing a levy for the tax refund fund, RCW 84.”
In Re City of Seattle, 261 P.2d 416 (Wash. 1953). · cites it 2× “1943, § 11265 (part); RCW 84.52.030 [ cf. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 11238].”
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Cowlitz Cnty., 745 P.2d 488 (Wash. 1987). “RCW 84.52.030, 84.56.020, .050. The provisions of the special forest land taxation scheme created in RCW 84.”
Air Base Hous., Inc. v. Spokane Cnty., 354 P.2d 903 (Wash. 1960). · cites it 2× “RCW 84.52.030 et seq. and 84.56.010 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.