Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 87.03.780 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The board of directors of an irrigation district, now or hereafter organized under the provisions of this chapter, may commence a special proceeding in and by which the proceedings for organizing such district or the proceedings of said board and of said district, providing for and authorizing the issue and sale of the bonds or refunding bonds of said district whether said bonds or refunding bonds or any of them have or have not then been sold or any contract entered or proposed to be entered into by the district, or any contract made or entered into, or to be made or entered into, for the payment of moneys to the United States or the state of Washington in connection with which bonds be not deposited with the United States or the state of Washington as provided in RCW 87.03.140, may be judicially examined, approved and confirmed.
There may be combined with the proceeding for the confirmation of the organization and formation of said district, either of the other confirmation proceedings above mentioned.
[ 1931 c 60 s 6; 1921 c 129 s 45; 1917 c 162 s 17; 1915 c 179 s 27; 1889-90 p 703 s 73; RRS s 7499. Formerly RCW 87.08.190.]
Notes:
Refunding bonds, 1929 act—Judicial confirmation: RCW 87.22.280.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1963–1964 · leading case: In Re Quincy Columbia Basin Irrigation Dist., 385 P.2d 715 (Wash. 1963).
In Re Quincy Columbia Basin Irrigation Dist., 385 P.2d 715 (Wash. 1963). “RCW 87.03.780 provides: “The board of directors of an irrigation district .”
In re East Columbia Basin Irrigation Dist., 395 P.2d 46 (Wash. 1964). “This action concerns the judicial approval of an amendatory repayment contract between the East Columbia Basin Irrigation District and the United States Government and is a special statutory proceeding provided for by RCW 87.03.780 et seq. 1 Following two special elections which…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.