Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 88.46.070 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The provisions of prevention plans and contingency plans approved by the department pursuant to this chapter shall be legally binding on those persons submitting them to the department and on their successors, assigns, agents, and employees. The superior court shall have jurisdiction to restrain a violation of, compel specific performance of, or otherwise to enforce such plans upon application by the department. The department may issue an order pursuant to chapter 34.05 RCW requiring compliance with a contingency plan or a prevention plan and may impose administrative penalties for failure to comply with a plan.
(2) If the director believes a person has violated or is violating or creates a substantial potential to violate the provisions of this chapter, the director shall notify the person of the director's determination by registered mail. The determination shall not constitute an order or directive under RCW 43.21B.310. Within thirty days from the receipt of notice of the determination, the person shall file with the director a full report stating what steps have been and are being taken to comply with the determination of the director. The director shall issue an order or directive, as the director deems appropriate under the circumstances, and shall notify the person by registered mail.
(3) If the director believes immediate action is necessary to accomplish the purposes of this chapter, the director may issue an order or directive, as appropriate under the circumstances, without first issuing a notice or determination pursuant to subsection (2) of this section. An order or directive issued pursuant to this subsection shall be served by registered mail or personally upon any person to whom it is directed.
[ 2000 c 69 s 7; 1992 c 73 s 21; 1991 c 200 s 420.]

Notes:

Effective dates1992 c 73: See RCW 82.23B.902.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2000–2007 · leading case: United States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000).
United States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000). “Wash. Rev. Code §§88.46.070 , 88.46.080, 88.”
Crafts v. Pitts, 162 P.3d 382 (Wash. 2007). “450 (stating the provisions of the Fish Marketing Act may be enforced by specific performance); RCW 88.46.070 (stating the prevention plans of the vessel oil spill prevention and response act may be enforced by specific performance); Golden v.”
Crafts v. Pitts, 161 Wash. 2d 16 (Wash. 2007). “450 (stating the provisions of the Fish Marketing Act may be enforced by specific performance); RCW 88.46.070 (stating the prevention plans of the vessel oil spill prevention and response act may be enforced by specific performance); Golden v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.